i dont belive in evolution just kinda curious on what others think and why.
2006-07-20 06:48:51 · 20 answers · asked by sar sar 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
sorry for those of you that did not understand the question devisadvoct , spike and sorry you cant handle a simple question!maybe you did evolve from a ape if you cant awnser a simple question maturely and without getting you panties in a twist then i dont want to hear your response awnsers from idiots dont do me any good anyways.
2006-07-20 07:26:37 · update #1
Good Question! If anyone here ever gives birth to an Ape let Me know! O.K. Ape's give birth to Apes Human's Birth Human's anything more than that is going off the deep end!
2006-07-20 06:56:56 · answer #1 · answered by Wayne S 3 · 0⤊ 5⤋
a million) we did no longer evolve from apes. apes and monkes and people share a difficulty-loose ancestor. in all likelihood something that looks like a lemur. 2) evolution is approximately filling nitches. you have a baby that has a ailment which makes it somewhat extra useful at residing reason it eats from timber, at the same time as you purely consume the bark of tress. you have yet another "accepted" baby. the two flow directly to have a good number of generations of toddlers. evoultion has created a sparkling species it extremely is extra useful suitable for a particular component, whether it has additionally left the previous one.
2016-12-14 10:46:56 · answer #2 · answered by priscilla 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am not an evolutionist, but the way I was taught in high school was that evolution says that man and ape have the same common ancestor. It does not say we came from apes.
2006-07-20 06:54:17 · answer #3 · answered by Dennis R 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well, theres dozens of different animals in the same families like that. apes, monkey, chimps, gorillas, etc. the same way theres lots of different cats, tiny little hairless ones and giant lions and tigers. we just have the same roots as the apes. but, its still possible that we may have come from a type of apelike creature that is no longer around. theres tons of evidence of evolution by the way. and i dont think that religion and evolution need to be opposite views either. theres ways they can coincide. actually pretty easily too.
and if you want to argue about it, prove to me that gravity exists. i dont need to believe it. i can give you a hundred reasons that gravity doesnt exist. i dont need to believe anything you say. but, that doesnt change the fact that its still there. just like theres tons of evidence of evolution.
2006-07-20 06:55:45 · answer #4 · answered by hellion210 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The display of flawed logic amuses me and simultaneously terrifies me.
How anyone can be so ignorant as to ask a question such as this and then send berating e-mails to people who respond to it in a manner appropriate to the question's inanity escapes me. This is not a person who seeks answers to sensible questions, it is a person who seeks to goad people into a childish battle in which she can refer to respondents as "retarded."
Watch your steps, folks. Sara really doesn't care what you think.
Nature is a thing that grows, Sara. It does not extinguish the things it begat, it expands them. Your parents did not die because you were born, a myriad of religions did not vanish because they created dissimilar branches and apes, chimpanzees, and the variety of humans on the planet did not cease to exist simply because they spawned a genetic variant that evolved into a species.
Think and learn.
2006-07-20 08:21:30 · answer #5 · answered by Speedo Inspector 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
1) no one ever said we evolved from apes, dumbass. Go learn about evolution before you make a further *** of yourself
Even given this:
2) If Americans came from Englishmen, why are Englishmen still around?
2006-07-20 06:51:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
if christians came from jews, why are there still jews.
if children come from adults why are there still adults.
how many times are we going to have to deal with this stupid question.
both humans and apes come from a common ancestor. each took a different path a long the evolutionary road due to different invierments and needs for survival.
2006-07-20 08:01:39 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Again! And why is this always the "Golden Argument" against evolution. Everyone who dismisses evolution offhand usually hasn't done their research, and probably isn't educated enough to understand anyway. *Sigh*
2006-07-20 06:59:03 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
We think humans and apes may have evolved from a common ancestor, not humans from apes.
2006-07-20 06:57:51 · answer #9 · answered by sunflower_pyxie 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Just as branches grow out of a single-stemmed sapling, it doesn't mean that they are no longer related when they become a major branch of the tree.
2006-07-20 06:54:34 · answer #10 · answered by kathy_is_a_nurse 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋