Adam + Eve vs. Evolution?

Question

I personally believe in evolution all the way! Although I do in God, I do not believ in Adam + Eve at all. Early people made that up because they wanted an explanation for where humans cam from.

I don't believe everything in The Bible because a human wrote it. But that doesn't mean that I can't believe in a God.

There is proof for evolution, isn't there?

I can be wrong. I'm only human, unfortunately.

Answer 1

where is the question? Everyone knows the adam and eve theory is a joke no matter what you believe in.

Answer 2

What is you evidence for evolution. What god do you believe in? The God of the Bible spoke directly to Moses, who wrote Genesis as inspired by the Holy Spirit. It is the history of how the earth was created. If you don't believe in Adam and Eve, it undermines the whole reason Christ came the die for our sins.

Answer 3

Evolution is not true no concrete evidence. It says in the Bible God created the Heavens and the Earth and all that is within them. Then states that God created Adam from the Dust of the Earth and breathed life in to him. God is all powerful. Also it states that he put Adam in charge of naming all the animals. So how could he have named them, if he was one. Also if evolution is true than how do you explain delivery rooms and people having babies. HUMAN BABIES, not monkeys. So your belief system is screwed up. You cannot believe in one thing and also say you believe in God cause that is wrong. On your other thought about the Bible that is the Word of God and yes it is written by man by the author is GOD. not man. So actually God did it. So take that and chew on it for awhile.

Answer 4

“The Bible story of Adam and Eve, father and mother of the whole human race, told centuries ago the same truth that science has shown today: that all the peoples of the earth are a single family and have a common origin.”
The Races of Mankind (New York, 1978), Ruth Benedict and Gene Weltfish, p. 3.

“All of us, if we went back far enough, hundreds of generations, would arrive at the same place . . . the evidence of science is that present men derive from a common stock.”
Publication by the Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization of the United Nations.

“All varieties of man belong to the same species and have the same remote ancestry. This is a conclusion to which all evidence of anatomy, paleontology, serology, and genetics, points. On genetic grounds alone it is virtually impossible to conceive of the varieties of man as having originated separately.” Anthropologist M. F. Ashley Montagu.

“Science now corroborates what most great religions have long been preaching:
Human beings of all races are . . . descended from the same first man.”
Heredity in Humans (Philadelphia and New York, 1972), Amram Scheinfeld, p. 238.

“The story of Adam and Eve in the book of Genesis has been vindicated, in part at least, by science. Its main point is now generally accepted as true: namely, that there is only one human family . . . with a common origin.”

Charles Darwin admitted:
“To the question why we do not find rich fossiliferous deposits belonging to these assumed earliest periods prior to the Cambrian system, I can give no satisfactory answer.”
The Origin Of Species” Page 90
Has the situation changed? Paleontologist Alfred S. Romer:
“Below this Cambrian period, there are vast thicknesses of sediments in which the progenitors of the Cambrian forms would be expected. But we do not find them.
The general picture could reasonably be said to be consistent with the idea of special creation.”
“Darwin And The Fossil Record” Page 466, 467.

Biochemist D. B. Gower comments:
“The story of the fossils agreed with the account of Genesis. In the oldest rocks we did not find a series of fossils covering the gradual changes from the most primitive creatures to developed forms, but rather, developed species suddenly appeared.”
Kentish Times (Dec.11/75) Page 4

Zoologist Harold Coffin concluded:
“On the basis of the facts alone, on the basis of what is actually found, the theory of a sudden creative act in which the major forms of life were established fits best.”
“Evolution Or Creation” Page 12

Answer 5

A writer is the only logical answer. the only question is how have been human beings created. despite if the Adam and Eve tale is right or no longer is rather no longer proper. we are able to probable not at all understand. So if the dinosaurs lived and died out, as is uncomplicated understanding, why did despite became into there first evolve into dinosaurs? And if all life became into filled out via an asteroid then how did it start up back? Are we to have self assurance that dinos became chickens? The greater we predict of all of us understand the fewer logical the tale of evolution turns into. Evolution is concept that demands various, "fill in the blanks" to additionally be available. yet human beings declare it as a certainty. rather a snicker, relatively.

Answer 6

How about both. Adam and Eve under intelligent design. In other words, God placed everything that was needed for "evolution" to go for it.

Answer 7

But if you reject Adam and Eve, you admit the Bible is flawed and a man-made creation. Then how can you accept the other parts about God?

Answer 8

Adam and Eve are a myth, you got that right.

problem is evolution is only a theory, and doesn't have much concrete evidence to support it.

Why can't people just know that there is a creator and be happy with that - to assume we can know all answers is arrogance.

Answer 9

If you believe in God, you have to believe in the Bible too. If you do not believe the bible, then you are saying that you do not believe God, because the bible is God's Word.

Answer 10

Christians like you make me happy! Yay for intellectual curiosity!