2006-07-20 05:57:30 · 20 answers · asked by michzi 2 in Food & Drink ➔ Non-Alcoholic Drinks
Nothing, they are both shite!
2006-07-20 05:59:43 · answer #1 · answered by moblopo36 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Diet Coke - Although it came out two years before “New” coke, diet coke that we’ve enjoyed since the 80s is the sugar free form of new coke. In other words, it’s based on the formula for the “New Coke” that wasn’t released yet (it debuted in 1985) when Diet Coke hit the market (1983), and is also now no longer available. (the New coke). Coca Cola has no plans at this time to discontinue the aspartame based Diet Coke, as it is third in the soda market. (After Coke and Pepsi, respectively.)
Coca Cola Zero - Sweetened with aspartame and acesulfame potassium., the reason this is different than Diet Coke is Coca Cola Zero is a sugar free version of the Classic Coke formulation. In other words, this is meant to be a sugar free version of the red cans of Coke you know and may or may not love. It has a redder, deeper color close to the color of Classic Coke and tastes far less like a diet soda (by many accounts) than Diet Coke
2006-07-20 06:02:01 · answer #2 · answered by maxie 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Coca Cola Zero has zero amounts of sugar, wheras Diet Coke has only less amount of everything that is in normal Coke.
2006-07-20 06:03:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Coca Cola ZERO is the best diet/light cola they have made. Real CocaCola is a lot better with that sugar rush.
2006-07-22 07:08:37 · answer #4 · answered by brogdenuk 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Market research showed men won't buy anything with diet on so re-packaged diet coke as coke zero basically, if you notice in the advert for coke zero it is all men and things aimed at men!
2006-07-20 06:03:27 · answer #5 · answered by keith 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
jointly as i'm not attentive to the chemical modifications between the two, i will remark on the style. Coca Cola 0 is a lot sweeter than nutrients ordinary Coke. a commonly happening nutrients ordinary Coke drinker, i attempted Coke 0 and located it to be comparable to ingesting commonly happening Coke. Very syrupy and very candy. jointly as the two are "0 calorie," I truthfully choose nutrients ordinary Coke for it particularly is "not so candy" style. i won't be ready to drink Coke 0 lower back.
2016-11-02 10:07:47 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Prob-ly the new and improved version of diet coke.? or maybe u'll notice the difference when yo read the ingredients on both cans.
2006-07-20 06:04:01 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nutrasweet IS Aspartame. they are the same neurotoxin. Look at the science, and check who has done the science. if it is funded by nutrasweet, Searle, Ajinimoto it will be science that gets the best results that money can buy.
According to independent scientific studies and thousands of personal email testamonies from people who have stopped eating or drinking anything with aspartame, Aspartame IS poisonous.
www.dorway.com
2006-07-20 06:07:07 · answer #8 · answered by kenhallonthenet 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have e-mailed their website to let them know how lousy their new "BlackWater" as I call it, is. There's no bite, no pick-up on it, no body, no spark. It's like someone who dresses like an opld friend of yours, but they're not.
0/10 Must do much, much better. I expect they'll bring it out in de-caff. What the hell will be in it then? They've taken out the sugar, the last calorie, and all the taste!
2006-07-20 06:04:00 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
What's the difference between this site yesterday and this site today? Absolutely no difference whatsoever ... the same questions just keep on being asked over and over and over again Zzzzzzzzz ...
2006-07-20 06:02:39 · answer #10 · answered by Away With The Fairies 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the difference is i would rather drink diet coke then coke zero as it is rank!!!
2006-07-20 06:01:06 · answer #11 · answered by ♥Pink Princess♥ 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋