2006-07-20 05:13:15 · 7 answers · asked by ? 3 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Visual Arts ➔ Painting
I think that nobody has the right to keep a paint but i think that France should have it because it's been there for years and any move could destroy it.
Also I think France because it's safest at Louvre than in Italy.
(My opinion)
2006-07-20 08:09:35 · answer #1 · answered by Roulla P 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
France, forwards like Henry, Trezeguet, and Cisse. Midfield Rothen, Vieira, Zidane, and Guily. protection Gallas, Sagnol, Silvestre, Thuram. Keepers Coupet, Barthez. Unstoppable, experienced team.
2016-10-08 03:13:34 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Leonardo actually willed the painting to his heir Sali and it is not known how it came to be in the French Royal collection. Thus ownership for this period can not be fully established. If we started giving back works of art to the artist's home country, where would this end? It would be chaos.
2006-07-20 21:45:00 · answer #3 · answered by samanthajanecaroline 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither. If you made a painting today, and sold it to someone from Tanzania, and your art someday became famous...Let us assume that painting was bought and sold a few times over the next few hundred years and wound up being bought by a French museum, would it be fair for your country (U.S.?) to ask for it back? Ownership has privledges.
2006-07-20 05:18:02 · answer #4 · answered by Buster Van Buren 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Leonardo da Vinci died at Chateau Amboise outside of Paris. He had no heirs to will it to. This is the only work that he kept, and it went everywhere he went.
2006-07-20 15:43:46 · answer #5 · answered by Lance U 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Give it to the French. It can be a consolidation prize for second place. ZING!!
2006-07-20 05:16:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Time honors crime
2006-07-20 05:16:28 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋