DOJ Dismisses Felony Tax Prosecution
-- With Prejudice -- After PRA Defense Raised
Evidence OMB Complicit In Income Tax Fraud
DOJ & IRS Petitioned To Explain
On May 12, 2006 in Peoria, Illinois, the attorney for the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) begged the court to dismiss all charges against IRS victim Robert Lawrence in federal District Court.
The motion for dismissal came on the heels of a surprise tactic by Lawrence’s defense attorney Oscar Stilley.
The tactic threatened exposure of IRS’s on-going efforts to defraud the public. The move put DOJ attorneys in a state of panic that left them with only one alternative: beg for dismissal, with prejudice.
Stilley’s tactic paid off. Sixty days earlier, the DOJ had indicted Lawrence on three counts of willful failure to file a 1040 form, and three felony counts of income tax evasion. The federal Judge dismissed all charges with prejudice, meaning the DOJ cannot charge Lawrence with those crimes again.
2006-07-20
03:12:44
·
9 answers
·
asked by
thetruthabout911
1
in
Business & Finance
➔ Taxes
➔ United States
READ THE ENTIRE STORY HERE
http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTP2/UPDATES/Update2006-06-09.htm
Also do yourself a favor and watch this movie. Stop being "sheeple" and learn how to be Americans again
http://www.freedomtofascism.com/
2006-07-20
03:14:46 ·
update #1
patrickmcc55
DID YOU EVEN READ THE DETAILS OF THIS POST????
May 12, 2006 <<<<< This just happened
The courts found in favor of someone refusing to pay taxes. And the reasoning behind this because he promised to bring to light the fact that it is illegal for them to ask us to pay taxes.
2006-07-20
03:38:44 ·
update #2
There are many, many tax evaders in prison due to the same kind of reasoning. I'm not sure of your age, but this idea's been around for YEARS!!
2006-07-20 03:17:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by clarity 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Wrong. The case's dismissal had nothing to do with the Stilley's PRA fantasy or any other tax protestor nonsense. The case was dismissed because the IRS agents, working with imperfect information due the the defendant's refusal to cooperate, used the wrong basis in computing the defendant's gain on the sale of rental properties. That error led to an erroneous tax computation. They discovered their error, informed the Judge and Stilley, and requested leave to amend the indictment. That was refused. The dismissal apparently does not preclude charging Lawrence with those crimes again, but rather precludes trying him based on the existing indictment. If the DOJ wishes to proceed, they will have to get a new indictment.
2006-07-22 08:32:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by Steve B 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Please, read the Constitution of the United States before you go quoting statements from morons. It's best to think and do some research before you simply believe what someone else tells you.
Amendment XVI - Status of Income Tax Clarified. Ratified 2/3/1913. Note History
The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.
So, since the Congress has the power to collect and lay taxes on incomes, and Congress created the IRS to do that for them, I don't really see how your argument stands up.
I mean, I COULD be wrong, but I'm pretty sure the Constitution is the highest law in the land.
2006-07-20 04:06:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by sjoschko 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Federal courts have consistently ruled that the IRS has the obligation to collect taxes under Federal LAw, and the right to prosecute those that evade payment.
You are doing a disservice to anyone gullible enough to buy into this proven urban legend that the governmnet has no legal right to collect taxes.
2006-07-20 03:17:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree. But think you for the info.I refuse to file.I claim no excempts on my w2 so pay in max taxes by the charts.I figure if that ain't good enought for the goverment they need to rework their tax tables.Anything they can get before I get my hands on the cash they are welcome to but afterwards its mine. I believe in a flat rate tax system.Put all of the worthless mouths out of goverment.
2006-07-20 03:26:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The colonies didn't fight against taxation they fought against TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION. Every American has representation, some better than others, in all levels of government.
The power of the government to tax IS founded in law, it is called the CONSTITUTION!
2006-07-20 03:58:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by Tax Man 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeh, wasn't taxes one of the reasons why the colonies declared independance.
2006-07-20 03:17:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by WhiteHat 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
i don't choose people making under one hundred,000 a 300 and sixty 5 days paying vast taxes. i choose people making countless million to countless billion money a 300 and sixty 5 days paying lots of taxes. i choose companies paying taxes. no one merits that lots money without paying lots lower back to the community which taxes in theory do. they have the privilege of doing employer in a rustic that allowed them to incur that massive wealth. did you recognize that individuals making under $one hundred,000 a 300 and sixty 5 days pay much less taxes under Obama than Bush? not that i'm fullyyt pleased with Obama. I comprehend which you do not choose people getting your money which you do not sense deserve it (welfare) yet stabilizing the decrease type, stabilizes and builds close by communities which advantages you. "Now, maximum progressives that I debate approximately taxes enhance faith and say that I might desire to choose to pay larger taxes on the grounds that's what the vast majority of world's faith say." What progressives are you speaking too? it fairly is a daft argument. " No, i don't choose to pay larger taxes for colleges. i do in comparison to young little ones, I hate young little ones and choose not something to do with them." whilst they improve up they are going to be greater knowledgeable adults meaning they're going to earn extra money and create jobs and boast the financial equipment. ""decrease tax" is meant to be "decrease type" What? despite if i'm real (which I of course think of i'm) i don't think of i ought to cajole you to desert the ideals which you adhere to strongly,that would not worry me. i don't think of you're in seek of an answer, i think of you like mock people who respond to you. Mock away.
2016-11-02 09:57:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by overbay 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
YEP. I NEVER PAY FED. INCOME TAXES. (EVER)
2006-07-20 04:09:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by rhett_madison 3
·
0⤊
0⤋