Can't anyone admit that there is no way(at least in the near future) of proving where existence originated?
2006-07-20 00:12:15 · 14 answers · asked by hairypussy 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
No one can prove anything. Even evolution is just a theory (most people will have difficulty with this). Creationism and evolution are both faith based believes. I personally believe creationism has much more substance and makes more sense than the previous.
2006-07-20 00:18:02 · answer #1 · answered by victory 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The universe has an origin, it has a birthdate, "Something" gave birth to the universe. Scientists say the universe is roughly around 14 to16 billion years old. This would mean that there was a dormant state of "nothingness" before the universe existed. How can "something" suddenly be born from "nothing"? "Nothing" is a LACK of anything, it's empty. Physical matter is non-existent in "nothingness". There are no tools for "nothingness" to create something. How could've the universe defied this and then spontaneously existed, just like that? at random, and with no purpose or driving force behind it's existence? A purposeless, pointless, random existence with no driver behind the wheel? You can accept that and die unhappy in your "pointless" life, or, you can accept the fact that: IN THE BEGINNING, GOD CREATED.
2006-07-20 00:42:02 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I personally believe before I became flesh and blood,I Iived as an individual and an identity separately in my father and mother. I am not a victim of circumstance and it was not because my father courted my mother that I was born.
Life in the 'subconscious state' is the beginning of the revelation, materialization and manifestation of creation, and to challenge and understand this is to challenge and understand God.
2006-07-20 00:45:11 · answer #3 · answered by Goddy-T 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Origin of life nobody can prove.But all scientists agee the first form life orignated in water.Theory of Evolution also unbelievable.if the survival of the fittest is correct there should be only one form of life.Man and monkey cannot co exist.Theory of Creation is more credible as it explains many forms of life,animals,birds and man.
2006-07-20 00:25:31 · answer #4 · answered by leowin1948 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The origin of life is due to the formation of the moon, not any silly outside gods.
2006-07-20 02:55:55 · answer #5 · answered by American Spirit 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends entirely on which of two groups you ascribe to. One believes it was created as stated in a 16th century manuscript, the other believes in empirical evidence collected through years of study.
2006-07-20 00:17:40 · answer #6 · answered by neorapsta 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes
2006-07-20 00:18:07 · answer #7 · answered by d.perrot@btinternet.com 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope because it will be proven in the near future. "They'll never get a man on the moon."
2006-07-20 00:54:17 · answer #8 · answered by kano7_1985 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
God is the origin of life.
2006-07-20 00:23:09 · answer #9 · answered by jp 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Depends on your definition of proof...
2006-07-20 00:58:22 · answer #10 · answered by ariadne2003uk 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋