2006-07-19 18:32:39 · 9 answers · asked by Dr. Doom 2 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Medicine
I'm pro-choice, but is there a better way?
2006-07-19 18:40:33 · update #1
It is a great technology and Bush did the wrong thing.
I wonder if he needed a new kidney or heart and his life depended on it if he would have vetoed it?
2006-07-20 04:43:15 · answer #1 · answered by Texas Cowboy 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Bush has seen to it that america will fall behind the rest of the developed world. I wonder which country will be the next world power?
Scientifically, I think it's great. It can lead to self-organ replacements for people who might not otherwise live. To all the "pro-life" people out there: it's not a human being until it's born, until then, it's just a developing animal, inside its mother. Why is this so hard to understand?
Aren't you worth more now than when you were a week after conception??
2006-07-20 01:56:04 · answer #2 · answered by Michaelsgdec 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it's awesome technology that can save lives and improve the quality of living by allowing doctors to grow replacement organs that are 100% compatible with their hosts. Lung cancer? No problem. Get a new lung. Heart disease? We'll fix that too. This is the immediate goal. Who knows what hasn't been thought of.
ohh yea... it takes an embryo that's only a few days old to harvest the stem cells. this kills the embryo.
equals: psycho christians flipping out.
solution: other contries will develop this information and the USA will lag behind.
2006-07-20 01:42:52 · answer #3 · answered by E-rok 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Right to lifers and Bible thumpers need to chill out on this one and let the scientists experiment and tinker and research all they want. The potential benefit to all mankind far outweighs any right to moral posturing. This research could lead to cures (or at least treatments) for EVERYTHING! No more disease, sit back and imagine that for a moment. Then explain to a seven year old dieing from Lymphoma how you're too squeamish about dead fetuses to let them find a cure and save his life. Go ahead.
2006-07-20 01:47:44 · answer #4 · answered by eggman 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush just vetoed it, which makes me hate him even more.
When I didn't think it was possible.
PS: I think stem cell is going to be to us what the pollio vaccination was in the 50s.
Life changing.
2006-07-20 01:39:58 · answer #5 · answered by AprilRocksIt 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I THINK ITS WRONG TO KILL AN EMBRYO JUST TO TRY AND SAVE SOMEONE ELSE. IT DOESN'T EVEN MAKE SENSE. YOU DON'T KILL SOMEONE TO SAVE SOMEONE. ITS STUPID AND ITS WRONG. BUSH DID THE RIGHT THING YESTERDAY WHEN HE VETOED ON THE STEM CELL RESEARCH. AND ALL CHRISTIANS WILL AGREE.
2006-07-20 09:03:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it's a potential miracle, although it's more of an untapped resource right now.
2006-07-20 01:36:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
a scientific miracle
2006-07-20 01:35:35 · answer #8 · answered by Erik 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
great idea
2006-07-20 03:16:35 · answer #9 · answered by pianist 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋