English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Earlier i found an article stateing that the Muslims and Islamic people are the cause for wars and no peace. I dont agree because this isn't true, not all muslims and islamics are the same. So i was reading the article and it says " In order to make peace on earth possible, we must wipe out the muslim and islamic race, all of it children, adults and seniors, take some jets and atomc bombs and drop them all over the islamic continent of asia and the muslim world also in africa. This would bring peace on earth. Without those devil worshiping deamons our earth will be safe" Do you agree? please comment.

2006-07-19 18:21:21 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

Jesus people, im not the one who wrote this!! so stop saying I'm racist and stuff! read! i clearly said " i dont agree etc.." besides my uncles wife is muslim and my cousins and i love them, muslims are people and i like them just the way they are and have no prob with them!

2006-07-19 18:36:46 · update #1

14 answers

I don't agree with the Article....we are practically goin back to World War 2, when Hitler wanted to wipe out the jews just because he didn't like them....and now theres a war because one guy wants another one dead and he hasn't found him in 5 years, and also its about the oil in that country,,,the reason why some people want the muslims dead is because they are told that it is the muslims killing people, doing suicde bombings, everytime u turn on the news especially CNN u see on the head lines..'Suicide Bomber in town north of Bagdad' or something like that, the news reporters and all them people are only concentrating on the muslims because they are not well off like most countrys, yet they are not a third world country.....muslims are just stuck in the middle with the real thing thats happening and all over a three letter word.....OIL...something that affects our econonmey thousands of miles away...and affect how much gas we put into our pumps....I'm not saying no names....but I ask this.....Please stop the "war on terrisom"....and jus make a multi-billion dollor deal wit the country or whomever takes care of the oil in Iraq....if u stop the "war on terrisom" I think they will not bother the us once again...jus boast up military security in sky

2006-07-19 18:33:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

GROW UP
racial hate and religious divisions that exist on this planet have always been created by world leaders of all cultures.,so that the dumb people (like you,and many others)will fight each other and the elite make money on the conflict as well as having them more under control
,
war never creates peace,it results in more hate and retaliation(more war).like fakking for virginity.your suggestion is childish,,as well as insane and hypocritical(check www.infowars,dark secrets in Bohemian grove,it is your own leaders who are the real devil worshipers )
and if you dont agree with it why do you even post this crap

this is an article by the free press in Houston

" The world's power structures have always 'divided to conquer' and have always 'kept divided to keep conquered.' As a consequence the power structure has so divided humanity--not only into special function categories but into religious and language and color categories--that individual humans are now helplessly inarticulate in the face of the present crisis. They consider their political representation to be completely corrupted therefore they feel almost utterly helpless. "
- R. Buckminster Fuller (1981) Critical Path
Whenever the people are well-informed, they can be trusted with their own government. Whenever things get so far wrong as to attract their notice, they must be relied on to set them right. Notably, this IS common-sense.

you are a victim of propaganda and a follower of devil worshipers yourself.maybe you should be nuked

2006-07-20 01:40:40 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

read the last line especially:

The Sunday TimesMay 01, 2005

The secret Downing Street memo

SECRET AND STRICTLY PERSONAL - UK EYES ONLY
DAVID MANNING
From: Matthew Rycroft
Date: 23 July 2002
S 195 /02

cc: Defence Secretary, Foreign Secretary, Attorney-General, Sir Richard Wilson, John Scarlett, Francis Richards, CDS, C, Jonathan Powell, Sally Morgan, Alastair Campbell

IRAQ: PRIME MINISTER'S MEETING, 23 JULY

Copy addressees and you met the Prime Minister on 23 July to discuss Iraq.

This record is extremely sensitive. No further copies should be made. It should be shown only to those with a genuine need to know its contents.

John Scarlett summarised the intelligence and latest JIC assessment. Saddam's regime was tough and based on extreme fear. The only way to overthrow it was likely to be by massive military action. Saddam was worried and expected an attack, probably by air and land, but he was not convinced that it would be immediate or overwhelming. His regime expected their neighbours to line up with the US. Saddam knew that regular army morale was poor. Real support for Saddam among the public was probably narrowly based.

C reported on his recent talks in Washington. There was a perceptible shift in attitude. Military action was now seen as inevitable. Bush wanted to remove Saddam, through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD. But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy.

2006-07-20 01:24:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

What article were you reading?! Absolutely not. Being muslim doesn't make you a terrorist. Islam isn't based on killing everyone. Yes, there are radical muslims. They are making life difficult for many, but there have been radicals in all religions, all races, all factions of our world. If we wiped out every group based on their religious or racial features, we would have no population. We need to bring peace NOT by war, NOT by murder, but by help, by good will.

2006-07-20 01:25:24 · answer #4 · answered by AprilRocksIt 3 · 0 0

No, I don't agree. More wars are started in the name of religion than any other reason. I have met Muslims and, for the most part, they are good people. Just like I have met fanatics from Christian religions and they drive me up the wall.

We have the great opportunity in America to choose our religious preferences. That doesn't give us the right to force our religious views on others, and that is what (my opinion) defines a fanatic.

2006-07-20 03:09:20 · answer #5 · answered by My world 6 · 0 0

What in the hell were you reading...was the author Adolph Hitler? I served 2 years in Iraq as a Marine, met a lot of really great Muslim and Islamic people, they were very interesting and kind people, not at all trying to eat my Christian heart as your article suggests.

2006-07-20 01:27:45 · answer #6 · answered by William 2 · 0 0

No. I am Christian, but the person who wrote this appears to be a fanatic of some sort. This is NOT the solution that would bring about real world peace. You know this. What kind of comments are you looking for?

2006-07-20 01:29:09 · answer #7 · answered by alcachofita 3 · 0 0

I don't agree at all. But that's exactly what most Muslims would like to do to the Jews and Americans.

2006-07-20 01:25:52 · answer #8 · answered by anthony c 2 · 0 0

hey,this is the most terrible thing:devil worshipping demons?
muslims?c'mon,this is absurd..of course you have fanatics in every religion,remember the Inquisition in Spain,i'm a catholic
and not proud of it when i read all the past horrors the ghettos and so on.fanatism is not a muslim specialty.

2006-07-20 01:34:14 · answer #9 · answered by asso 4 · 0 0

Sounds like prejudicial baloney to me. It's obvious not all of them like war of any kind.
Besides, God says "Do not commit murder." This includes under the guise of war.
"Taking them all out" is the raving of a racist lunatic.

2006-07-20 01:26:22 · answer #10 · answered by krazykritik 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers