2006-07-19 11:11:43 · 8 answers · asked by Jack Nicholson 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
No, It's not. Even if it was right now, it won't be soon. Since The United States has givin Israel the go-ahead to invade Lebanon and has condemmed Hezbollah (A Shi'ite oranization) many Shi'ites in Iraq will rally against the Americans. The new Iraqi government will not be all to happy either since so many of the seat holders are Shi'ite. My prediction is that Iraq is going to erupt like a valcano very soon becuase the insurgency will have new recruits from both Shi'ite and Sunnis now. I think Sadr will be playing a major roll in any new developments. The Green Zone might not be as safe as its said to be.
2006-07-19 11:19:14 · answer #1 · answered by Ulterior 2 · 4⤊ 2⤋
The situation has never been under control. The more the US tries to force its values on the people, the more out of control the situation in Iraq will become.
2006-07-19 11:16:17 · answer #2 · answered by darthbouncy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ah United States body count 2,550+ as 7/19/2006. The words "control" and "Iraq" (in the same sentence) are an oxymoron at this time!
2006-07-19 13:10:25 · answer #3 · answered by rampdogg2000 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think of that Makeshift has have been given it particularly plenty suitable with some minor historic innacuracies (Germany declared conflict on the u . s . a . the day after Pearl Harbor, no longer any opposite direction around). I additionally see that there are stupid human beings back concerning the actuality that Bush's daughters are actually not in Iraq. at first it is regulation below your shape that a serving presidents infants won't be able to serve in a conflict zone. Secondly you haven't any longer any draft so it is completely their determination no be counted if or no longer they circulate into the protection stress or no longer, and all the human beings who're in Iraq and Afghanistan willingly volunteered for a activity the place they could carry a gun and get shot at. No-one compelled them. as quickly as any newborn is of protection stress age their mum and dad can neither end them or stress them into going into the protection stress. The argument is stupid. ultimately, the two Iraq and Afghanistan is proving to catch the attention of the main fanatical terrorists to return and salary their Jihad. Is'nt it extra desirable that they face up against our fairly knowledgeable and nicely geared up conflict struggling with troops 7,000 miles away the place we are beating them 500:a million or could or no longer it is extra desirable in the event that they have been residing in downtown Detroit or manhattan or London making plans to explode somebodys commuter prepare? My determination is to enable my military combat them someplace else. the two that or enable me take an M16 on the subway to artwork so as that a minimum of i will combat back whilst they convey the phobia back to my streets.
2016-11-02 09:03:18 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is close, the government is in place, the police are learning to do their jobs, & the Army is on the upward learning curve. They quit laying down their guns to go home for lunch. Big improvement.
2006-07-19 11:20:37 · answer #5 · answered by Wolfpacker 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are you kidding? Soldiers are being killed every day, there is a civil war going on, and there is no end in sight.
2006-07-19 11:15:56 · answer #6 · answered by October 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I Dont Think It Is.
2006-07-19 11:18:01 · answer #7 · answered by mks 7-15-02 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO.
2006-07-19 11:15:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋