I think they're both funny. Can you imagine a reality show about Christians trying to convert homosexuals?? Think about it: Christians screaming Bible verses and praying, homosexuals having hissy fits, lots of finger snapping, and undoubtedly some FABULOUS outfits! Somebody get Fox on the phone, I think we have a HIT!!
2006-07-19 10:51:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by browneyedgirl 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
1
2006-07-19 10:32:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by . 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think both are horrible, but from a Christian point of view I have to say that the first is more horrible.
I agree with you that both options are insane. But I have some gay friends and they tell me that many men are willing to try something at least once. I think that real heterosexual men cannot be converted to homosexuality even after one time sex experiment, and I think that homosexuals cannot be converted to heterosexuality by heterosexual men, unless God is involved.
I do not think this is a laughing matter though, I feel it is sad.
2006-07-19 18:42:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by SeeTheLight 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, the first one isn't so insane. In fact that kind of thing happens almost as much as Christians trying to convert homosexuals. Only it doesn't happen with 9 gay men and one straight man. It happens to women, every time they walk into a place where they are outnumbered. If a guy can be a pig to me, then he can handle a gay dude being a pig to him. Welcome to my world.
2006-07-19 10:41:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by Maria Isabel 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
As I am living proof that Jesus can change anyone, I am no longer a homosexual. Any man can become a homosexual, it's a sexual addiction to perversion, no one is born a homosexual. Some men get involved because the free flow of sexual partners, others become homosexual because thier fathers were incapable of teaching thier sons to be real men, so their sons grow up with a lack of wisdom and start seeking a "Father" figure through sexual acts with other men.
2006-07-19 10:34:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
1. But then I am a straight woman and I wouldn't want to be in a house with either 9 gay men, straight men, or gay or straight women.Too much drama and too many people.
Peace Be With You,
Debra
2006-07-19 10:31:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by Debra M. Wishing Peace To All 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Obviously you see some commercial value in the sadness that is Gay, so what would be the prize to the winner? I really can't see how it would be entertaining but then I haven't watched sitcoms for ten years, used my television as a computer monitor with webtv. Its amazing what one can do for entertainment if one has both a brain and a body.
2006-07-19 10:42:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by Marcus R. 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think they are both impossible. I think the more horrible of the two are the second option. It kills me that some people call themselves Christians but are capable of actually hating homosexuals. Doesn't Christianity teach not to hate?
2006-07-19 10:33:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by ♥dream_angel♥ 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
We don't need anymore fudge packers in the world, convert the gay to straight. Good luck finding someone for the other option.
2006-07-19 10:32:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by Frank 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
1) how about add if the straight guy converts to PERMENANT homosexuality he has to marry one of the gay guys, be the bottom, ( and slave ) and will win a million bucks?
this would be interesting since no one can change their sexual orientation, they are what the are as science tells us. anyone who says they can change, especially because Jesus or God changed them is the ultimate hypocrite as they know damn well they are lying to them selves and anyone else. you dont have to have sex but you dont lose the urge. (for example, I love tacos so I am hetero, I never had to turn to the lord to reject hot dogs). so this defeats the whole point of the question...
Vin
2006-07-19 10:33:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋