English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I read so many of the questions and answers from the Pro-crime crowd that says that illegals are NICE and NOT bothersome AND hard working.

Is it residency via popularitycontest?
should the LAW (there is that big nasty unrelenting word again!) be only applied to people that are not nice?

I am sure that there nice ans not nce people on both sides of the debate. I am equally sure that EVRYONE is not nice at times. Are they only to be caught and deported during their moments of not-niceness?
how abut we do this?
EVERYONE CLOSE THEIR EYEs!
put a bunch of crimes that exist (written on paper slips) in a hat and let NICE people pick a crime they can commit because it will be legal for them, because they are nice.
Let's give the not nice people the sme choices and then punish then because they are no nice.
OK?

Is that stupid?
Of course it is!
But that seems to be the idea and ideals on the pro-crime crowd.

I am sorry you got raped ma'am, but nuthin' we can do, you see, he is just so NICE!

2006-07-19 07:22:53 · 6 answers · asked by athorgarak 4 in Politics & Government Immigration

hmmmm...
someone that cannot see the correlation between crime and illegals?
crime and illegalare the sme basic thing is being the same as something correlation enough?
there is this neat little thing called a dictionary. it has words in it and what they mean. look up crime and illegal

pancha que bueno mija

I am going to start taking your wonderful tactic I will ignore any and all valid points, reality even and just wash it all ways with the word
bullcrap.
wow now The victory goes back to me
lame, honey, really lame.
why not resort to:
is not
is too
is not
is too

that is just as mature and informative, but then again your side has NOTHING to support your stance, does it
other than bullcrap, I mean!

2006-07-19 09:03:29 · update #1

My dear friend of tesla.
so you think that catching criminals is racist? you yourself just said they should be deported. I said use the military because it would be almost free! as soldiers get paid if they sit on their butts and do nothing or if they are training.
as for the poor illegal mommy feeding her baby a piece of bread
YES I would deport her as sell!
white, black, red, yleeow, mexican, english, russian, chinese, canadian
You name it-color, sex, creed and country of origin mean nothing to me only the fact that they are illegal.
DO NOT put your concept of me on this site and get mad at me for ideas that came from YOUR head!
If you want to know how I feel, write to me and I will tell you in no un certain terms, and you will be able to leave you error filled powers of divination at the door!

2006-07-19 09:09:16 · update #2

sarcasm is a sign of a weak mind? ok if you say so! when I wrote targets it was targets for capture. too bad that you cannot follow a thought and understand things from context!
You see a target can be nearly anything that is the object or goal, and it does not have to mean the goal of a speeding bullet!

our target this quarter is 20% sales increase

DUCK HE'S GOT A GUN!! aaahhhhhhh!

That seems to be how you would view it
Perhaps you would rather I use the term 'mark'
or subject or something new, perhaps?
Should we invent a new word to please you?
Yes let's do that we will invent new words so that people who are unable to understand things can! a new word meaning the subject of a manhunt shall forever be known as a 'drimcrag' and it will be so that tesla's friend will finally understand something!
Let me call Webster's before they print the next edition
Drimcrag (drim' kreg) the TARGET of a manhunt
origin: YAHOO Q&A so that friend of tesla can understand what others write

2006-07-19 16:16:20 · update #3

6 answers

They understand it is wrong, they just don't care. They think only laws they agree with should be upheld. You know there are a few laws I would like to ignore as well, but I don't....

2006-07-19 07:36:00 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

What? I don't see the correlation between crime and illegals.
Ok, I'll give you the fact that they are working and not paying taxes. That pisses me off b/c taxes take out over 20% of MY pay check. I mean if I have to pay 'em you need to pay them as well.

However, most of the illegals that I've met are actually honest, hard working people. It's a very small few that are scum of the earth.

Listen, I live about an hour from Atlanta. I've seen some ugly things...the hispanics have nothing to do with it.

There are good people and there are bad people everywhere...you can't classify them based on race. These people are coming here b/c of the opportunities. They want to provide for their kids.....I don't have a problem with that as long as they're abiding by the law.

As far as criminals go - everyone should be held accountable regardless of race, creed, or religion. The law is the law and that's all there is to it. However, you can't blame a guy for trying to do better for his family....it's not like they're commiting fraud or stealing.....

Whatever dude....Have fun and lighten up. Who cares? Does any of this really matter to you? You're going to have a coronary if you worry about **** that's out of your control.

2006-07-19 14:24:43 · answer #2 · answered by Corn_Flake 6 · 0 0

It isn't that people are "pro-crime". I, for one, am against giving illegal aliens amnesty. They did, after all, commit a crime by coming into the country illegally. I think it is more that the punishment should fit the crime. For instance, if a mother steals a piece of bread to feed her children, should she be punished as severely as a rapist/murderer. I believe people are just tired of hearing the immigration issue used as a forum in which to spout racist views with impunity. These people are committing a crime, yes. Should they be deported? Yes. But, there are people who spout out nonsense such as "The armed forces can do training in urban settings (like hunting terrorists in Beirut) and the illegals can be their training targets". and then claim they are not bigots. Would you use the mother trying to feed her starving infant as a training target if she was white? I think not. If anyone suggested such a thing there would be outrage. But, hey, we are just talking Mexicans here right? Why not use them as target practice? They aren't real human beings right? It is sickening really. I am anti-crime, anti-illegal immigration, but pro humanity and anti-hatred. Oh, and i disagree that it is a victimless crime. There are many victims of this crime. Even illegal aliens are victimized by the very coyotes that were hired to get them into the country. Something does need to be done about the illegal alien problem.

2006-07-19 15:49:19 · answer #3 · answered by Nikki Tesla 6 · 0 0

Who are the victims of illegal immigration?Let me look into my crystal ball and see what you are gonna say........The American Taxpayers right?Bullcrap.Illegal immigration IS a victimless crime.All the harm that Americans say that illegals to do this country is b/s.

2006-07-19 14:39:01 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Good question next time can you type my report for me.

2006-07-19 14:25:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

hello!

2006-07-19 14:28:09 · answer #6 · answered by dyboy34 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers