You have to take a Metro North bus from the White Plains train station but I am not sure which one.
2006-07-19 04:30:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by Yisrael Chai 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hmm. some distinct solutions recommend themselves. one million. First, are you particular that is govt and now not a private business enterprise it really is charging you for crossing the bridge? using actual actuality each and each governments & deepest agencies have commonly engaged in "turnpike" progression, meaning the construction of transportation infrastructure initiatives (like bridges, yet more suitable somewhat frequently that is roads) that is supported by skill of technique of shopper expenditures. 2. also, as conservative capitalist economists like to discuss, "there isn't any such component as a free lunch." someone has to pay for construction & preserving this bridge. If now not you & different commuters -- then everyone else. question is - who? 3. How a lot did the bridge value, vs how a lot the govt.. Is now amassing from it? once you consider that doubtlessly the federal authorities is "stealing" from you using actual undeniable actuality that they paid off progression & upkeep charges some time previous, and now they're in basic terms using the bridge as a money cow. very in all likelihood, some corrupt baby-kisser is pocketing your person expenditures and using it for rotten applications -- for public worker pensions, interior the shape you hate retired public workers, or for cocaine & whiskey activities with underaged prostitutes, or inspite of. if so, in all likelihood you have become robbed. 4. yet likely, the federal authorities borrowed money -- from bond holders -- to construct this bridge instead of raising taxes for this objective. and using actual undeniable actuality that the federal authorities hasn't charged taxpapers for the bridge, the costs it costs commuters for using it are essential to pay off the bond holders -- needed, and therefore valid. 5. Or likely the bridge progression charges are already paid, even if the consumer costs are nevertheless wanted to cover protection prices for this & different infrastructure projects. so as that the article would not fall down below you some Monday morning, or buckle on a scorching summer season day. So that is plausible the authorities is overcharging you & different shoppers for utilising the bridge, yet very in all likelihood, they're now not. the answer ought to bypass both way, reckoning on circumstances. if you happen to gave us with more suitable significant factors, then in all likelihood we may grant you with more suitable definitive & more suitable logical techniques. -- democratic socialist / now not a liberal, just about
2016-12-10 11:53:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋