Why do Creationists hate science?

Question

Don't people want to know what is actually true rather than what is in a fictional book?

Cameron C and trentroy, can y'all tell me the definition of the word "theory" is in a scientific context?

Answer 1

Creationists are completely ignorant imbeciles. It just proves that no matter how patently absurd an idea might be, there will always be a collection of loonies who will believe in it. Mental illness in action.

Answer 2

Creationists don't hate science; they hate it when scientists draw conclusions not based on the evidence, simply because it supports their own personal beliefs.

Scientists will tell you: "The evidence that fits the theory goes in the paper; the evidence that doesn't quite fit goes in the footnotes; and the evidence that contradicts the theory gets thrown away and ignored."

Evolution is the most anti-scientific theory ever to be proposed, but it's supported (in spite of the evidence) because evolutionists start with the assumption that God doesn't exist, and 'spin' the evidence to support it.

Answer 3

creation is far more scientific than evolution.

in science, all facts and findings are placed out in the open. why then, are things being hidden that would hinder the evolutionist claim? ie, footprints of humans inside footprints of dinosaurs made at the same time, the skeletons of giant humans (which would agree with the Bible's statement of there being giants in the land, and also would suggest that we are devolving as opposed to evolving), the human artifacts found within the layers of coal, the "dinosaurs" that are still living today. and where are these "missing links", the ones that have been found but keep disappearing? and why is it that when one of your "missing links" is proven to be a sham, you continue to teach it as though it is a fact?

true scientists put everything they find on the table. if it goes against their hypothesis, they change their hypothesis. they don't change the facts to fit their fiction. all evidence points to a young earth, with everything being created at the same time (at least within a week), and is in line with the Bible's accoutn of creation.

the true haters of science are the ones that try to disguise their propoganda under the guise of "science", aka the evolutionists

darwin asked for a "black box". the eye.

Answer 4

As I genuinely have pronounced before, maximum creationists are monotheists and as such have faith that their god 'created' each little thing only is it states of their mythology books. (i.e. the bible, Quran, etc...) technological know-how has shown time and time back that their man or woman mythologies are only that...myths. The solar replace into no longer created after the earth. the international...and the full universe is plenty, plenty older then the 6,one hundred years that their books depict as is humanity. As such, their faiths, based on the mythologies of their books could be laughed at. the respond is to declare that technological know-how is incorrect and faith is actuality. In different worlds, Creationists that ignore approximately technological know-how are actually not something yet fools and idiots. Statements like "what I hate is whilst human beings attempt to apply technological know-how to respond to questions it wasn't designed to respond to." is only par for the direction? What questions isn’t technological know-how "designed" to respond to? the only answer to that query is 'mind's eye'. technological know-how is assertion and the implementation of techniques in line with those observations. Is their a god is an person-friendly scientific quarry with a somewhat user-friendly answer. NO! IS their anybody common definition or set of parameters for god which could be seen emanating from all cultures with the aid of background. No. Is their anybody center set of legends that reappear time and time back international extensive even in distant, unrelated aspects? No! Is their ANY scientific evidence that there is, replace into or could be a god or gods? No! Then to take it one step extra beneficial and prepare hypothetical circumstances. in case you anticipate that there is a few divine being, a author, is their any evidence (outdoors anybody man or woman religions 'holy texts') that anybody god is surely the authentic god? back, even then, the respond isn't any! So, the long and the in need of it is that god is a myth... a lie! some human beings could particularly have faith a lie then the data and as such, tend to ignore approximately, vilify or perhaps 'hate' something that stands interior the way of their lies, for this reason technological know-how, know-how and actuality. ~~

Answer 5

Actually, we like science. Just have a problem with people who have so much "faith" in science, they treat theory as if it was fact. So, I bet you think the man from ape thing is fact, huh? Did you realize its simply a theory, an unproven theory? But you defend it, don't you? You people make fun of christians for believing in God without proof, yet you blindly believe we came from apes, without any proof.

I like science, it hasn't in any way hurt my belief in God, the two go hand in hand. God creates, science prooves the evolution of the world since creation. Unfortunately, science also has theories which many people pretend are facts.

What's more rational, scientifically? A mysterious big bang from nothing, or God? And you guys call us illogical.

Answer 6

They were science retards at school but now they are adults they think they can go back and get revenge on the science teachers. They are thinking..

"Hey Mr ScienceTeacher.. you're not so big now! Now you have to listen to me talk about Fairy Tales and other crap and show me respect because I'm an adult and can vote, and have voted in my Creationist Supporting Wacko politician and because we live in a limited democracy where because most people don't bother to vote, I can force you all to accept my religious crap as if its based on reality and as if its a sound basis for society!"

Answer 7

They hate science until it can help them, as in medical science. Then they're cheering it on.
However, when more and more Archaeological and Evolutionary evidence points to the truth of Evolution, they start screaming and shouting. Going so far as accusing scientists of creating a "conspiracy" surrounding Evolution.
They really are pathetic.

Answer 8

Most of Science is irrelevant. The theory of evolution is not fully complete, but Christianity is.

Answer 9

I have not found this to be true, in fact I have a PhD in science and am a creationist

I see some rather fanciful ideas surroundin macro evolution
- cows to whlaes ??? moo

Answer 10

Don't hate science, imbrace it.

Who ever said that creation was not done using science?

God is the father of science, He used science to create because with out it nothing could exist.