2006-07-18 16:49:46 · 10 answers · asked by Brok3n 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
They haven't yet.
2006-07-19 09:09:53 · answer #1 · answered by CottonPatch 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Peace talks generally fail because one side always reneges against its commitments. Peace can never be achieved if one side tries its best to reconcile differences while the other continues to plot and execute the opponent's doom. The side that cheats on the talks does this because it either wants a far better bargain (which would almost always be to the detriment of the other side commited to the peace process, otherwise it could have lobbied diplomatically for it) or it simply wants everything (no negotiation, no surrender, no compromise).
You want examples...there are many. But here are my top 6.
1.) The Munich peace agreement of 1938 between the United Kingdom, France, Czechoslovakia and Nazi Germany. (what this resulted should be obvious by now)
2.) The series of "peace talks" between the Philippine's national Government and the communist New Peoples Army from the 1980s to the present.
3.) The Arusha Accords between the Hutu-dominated Rwandan government and the Tutsi-led Rwandan Patriotic Front in 1994
4.) The series of peace agreements and initiatives between Israel and the Palestinian Nation and/or the terrorist groups HAMAS and Hezbollah.
5.) The peace plans between the Tamil Tigers and the Sri-Lankan Government
6.) The series of talks regarding North Korea's nuclear program between NoKor and USA/South Korea/Japan/China/Russia.
2006-07-19 00:20:51 · answer #2 · answered by betterdeadthansorry 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The weaker side starts the talks and the strong side uses them to improve their position. The biggest example of the failure of peace talks is what happened in Korea and even in Lebanon. Israel gave back the territory they occupied and the UN was supposed to get things straight. That did not happen and here we are again tossing stuff across the green line.
2006-07-18 23:55:05 · answer #3 · answered by old codger 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
peace talks fail when the involved sides don't want peace. Israel obviously has a much greater objective than getting back their 2 soldiers. all the losses on either side are totally unnecessary.
2006-07-18 23:55:23 · answer #4 · answered by deadly_donkey 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
One side is usually evil. For example, there can be no peace in the middle east because muslims are evil (jews are good). The inevitable result is war. It will stop when the muslims are no longer in a position to do evil to anyone else.
2006-07-18 23:52:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
First off, Muslims are not evil and you're an idiot.
Secondly, it's usually because one side breaks off from the agreement.
2006-07-19 00:44:56 · answer #6 · answered by rockinfez 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The way you answer panacea is the way of evil, so you are the one who belongs to the evil not muslims.
2006-07-19 00:00:50 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
People don't like talk, they like action
2006-07-18 23:52:52 · answer #8 · answered by I think... 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
because evil is among us
2006-07-19 00:02:24 · answer #9 · answered by jp 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
All of them
People are dumb
2006-07-18 23:53:41 · answer #10 · answered by miss_gem_01 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋