In the interests of not seeing us go into an economic depression and the humanitarian needs of the world:
Mr Bush: I challenge you to a debate. Via video conference. Subject matter: World Affairs, US Economy, Poverty, Medicine, insurance, disaster response, terrorism, humanities future.
I will show up anywhere you want, no preparation, no prompters, no speech writers. Just you and me. VIa tele conference.
I challenge you to a duel sir.
I choose the weapon. Wits. An open live debate.
I want to speak for those that I speak to. Let the average American have a voice for once. Give me the opportunity and I will explain to you some of the things we could do to make our country the best it could be.
Honestly, Mr. Bush, I commend, as will historians, the major incentives you have given America to produce new business. Now I have the next part of that plan. The implementation. Let's have a good old fashion sit down.
2006-07-18 11:45:03 · 13 answers · asked by abehagenston 2 in Environment
Doing something is better then sitting there complaining.
Read some of my other answers if your question my cognitive thinking abilities
I am serious. I could do better than this guy.
2006-07-18 11:45:39 · update #1
Haha, this is funny. I see you've asked this question multiple times. You can go around saying you asked, you offered, you challenged him multiple times for a fair, intellectual debate on the issues, and he refused you, so he must have something to hide! Or maybe he doesn't have the stomach for you! Obviously, any politician who is serious about what they believe would jump at the opportunity to hold an honest live debate with any anonymous person off the Internet.
Please. Go find something productive to do with your life. You're not worth his time. And if you think that's conceited of him, give your city's mayor the same challenge. Unless you're another politician, you're not worth his or her time either. And if you are an elected politician, shouldn't you be serving your constituents in some useful fashion?
2006-07-18 11:57:49 · answer #1 · answered by Tim 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Give the poor guy a break. I mean, he must be a complete moron to have an MBA from Yale, and everyone knows that only certified imbiciles can be trained as fighter pilots. I'm sure you are much smarter and have better credentials.
2006-07-18 12:09:49 · answer #2 · answered by glcm1961 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the dollar nevertheless stops with him-he's (became into) a real president edit he had the nerve to make errors and not utilizing a teleprompter and all people to incorporate howard stern and letterman needed revenge for 9/11
2016-10-08 01:49:29 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush couldn't do that without teleprompters, prepared texts, and a hidden earpiece where Cheney could dictate answers to him.
If you have the intelligence of a mongoose, you'd have the advantage. -RKO-
2006-07-18 12:28:38 · answer #4 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you're over the age of ten, read as much as the average person and don't take a lot of drugs, you just might win!
2006-07-18 12:22:29 · answer #5 · answered by James H 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
My dog could do better than this guy. You ask him a serious question, and he'd pretend to listen, and then say, oh i thought you were gonna ask me about that pig were having for dinner.
2006-07-18 11:48:58 · answer #6 · answered by Eileen 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
C'mon. Be nice. In a battle of wits the man's unarmed.
2006-07-18 11:49:00 · answer #7 · answered by vanamont7 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yo. I dont have time. But my buddy blair will debate you. Used to be chainey but times have changed
2006-07-18 12:21:43 · answer #8 · answered by Dr M 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
OK fine I except I mean acept, no I accept your challenge.
2006-07-18 12:53:53 · answer #9 · answered by Matthew D 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
kill him for me pretty pleez, but save me a piece to beat up on.
2006-07-18 11:49:50 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋