English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

15 answers

Excellent question, sorry but I'm to simple to even attempt an answer at that.

2006-07-18 11:30:51 · answer #1 · answered by dopeysaurus 5 · 0 2

The wording of your question makes it clear that we would be able to understand it so we would not be too simple to understand. We would be at balance.

Now riddle me this Batman.

If our brains was simple enough for us to understand would we even care about the works of it?

I feel the best way to go with this would be to enlarge our brains to the point where we were smart enough to understand our brains. This would be a balance but on the other end of the scale.

2006-07-18 11:37:27 · answer #2 · answered by Don K 5 · 0 0

The French logician and Mathematician Pascal once stated, "the middle has its causes which the suggestions can no longer understand." even as i became youthful, i'd have responded sure, our brains quite some nerve cells and neurotransmitters that could act in virtually countless mixtures making our mind the equivalent of a supercomputer. finally we may be in a position to appreciate the mind. Now after being a reporter for decades and protecting quite some wars, i have considered too a lot of human beings die in the front of my eyes, i believe that individuals do have a soul or a spirit and hence should not be in a position to absolutely understand the mind, because Pascal is ideal, we don't have any way of measuring the the intangible area of the human gadget -- the "heart" or the spirit. we may be able to understand the anatomy of the human mind right down to the perfect cellular and right down to the perfect neurotransmitter, in spite of the indisputable fact that it received't carry us any in route of understanding how the mind works.

2016-12-01 21:08:04 · answer #3 · answered by gaymon 3 · 0 0

Complexity can evolve from simpler forms. In this instance a scientific community as a whole may be able to accurately describe/replicate the human brain. The OP's question references a famous quote, the invalid form of which would also apply to arguing against intelligence evolving from simplicity.

2013-10-12 23:38:55 · answer #4 · answered by Mikey 1 · 0 0

Good question! Which basically means I may have a too-simple brain to give you a good answer.

2006-07-18 11:30:48 · answer #5 · answered by gerrie 2 · 0 0

YES! Most definitely.

Personally I think our modern obsession with everything being simple, analysable, understandable and so on obscures a whole world of truth from us.

Embrace complexity. Deal with it on its terms, or not at all.

If we did that, life would make so much more sense

2006-07-18 11:29:39 · answer #6 · answered by wild_eep 6 · 0 0

Why yes, simple minds tend to flock together, hence Yahoo! Answers.

2006-07-18 11:30:54 · answer #7 · answered by sean1201 6 · 1 0

complexity is almost a meaningless term. Things only seem complex until you understand them, when they seem very simple.

2006-07-18 11:42:50 · answer #8 · answered by richy 2 · 0 0

yes simple minds can not solve complex issues!

2006-07-18 11:29:36 · answer #9 · answered by sorrells316 6 · 0 0

Yes. Very deep.

2006-07-18 11:29:47 · answer #10 · answered by Helen 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers