For people who are really against abortion: Would you carry the antichrist full term?

Question

Or have your wife/daughter/sister do that?

No my mom did not.

Answer 1

I am not able to carry a child.

Being against abortion doesn't come with an exception clause attached, so yes, were I able, I would carry the child full term, as I would expect my mother, wife, daughter or sister to do. It comes part and parcial to being pro-Life (or anti-Murder).

Answer 2

Considering that I probably wouldn't know until it was an adult, yeah, I would. I would hope though, that my parenting skills would mean that it wouldn't be the antichrist. Even the antichrist can make his own choices.

But if I knew by some revelation that it would be the antichrist, I'd still carry it to term. There must be opposition in all things, and whether there is going to be an antichrist or not, good will always win.

Answer 3

Anti-Christ means against the truth.

There are many antichrists, and they were already around when the New Testament was written: 1 John 2:18; 1 John 4:3; 2 John 7

Answer 4

You would have no choice to carry the Antichrist full term. He would not be able to die until about halfway into the end of times period. So there you go.

Answer 5

If only I had a womb I would.

But then again so should Christians. They are so myopic. The only way their heaven on earth can be established, and their popsicle stick savior can return is if the antichrist is born and does his thing. They should be *begging* for his appearance.

Answer 6

the important on your argument is at what component is the infant seen a man or woman. people who oppose all abortions have faith that the little you may desire to be risk-free because of the fact it is a separate existence interior the mother from the time of theory. people who have faith abortions could desire to be allowed suitable to delivery have faith the infant isn't a separate existence form till it is born so at 38 weeks a mom could desire to be allowed to have an abortion. My very own perception is that abortions could desire to be constrained and not used as a variety of delivery administration. The "morning after pill" and delivery administration pills could desire to be as person-friendly to acquire as condoms. a woman could desire to offer up the main appropriate to her reproductive equipment (different than in situations of rape, incest, and endangerment of the existence of the mother) whilst she gets pregnant. the rationalization is that human beings could desire to take very own duty for their strikes. delivery administration is somewhat attainable and including person-friendly availability of the morning after pill could get rid of any valid rationalization for human beings to be irresponsible and subsequently could desire to hold an undesirable newborn to complete term with the daddy figuring out to purchase scientific expenses. EDIT: There are extremes on the two facets of the concern. professional-lifers who do no longer want any contraceptives and professional-abortion who want abortions to the 2nd the umbilical cord is decrease. luckily, maximum everyone seems to be lifelike and want some thing in-between.

Answer 7

Here's a poser for you Christians.

If there was a test that could prove that the fetus you carried would become a homosexual, would you abort?

Answer 8

That is an awesome question...man i wish i would have thought of it...do they know its the anti-christ ?? I would say they would aborte it cus well they don't want the end of the world coming.

Answer 9

i wouldnt have someone else do it..its their choice but its not like you would know its the antichrist, he wont tell anyone hes the antichrist til hes older .... and has more power....

Answer 10

I am a man but hey why not? abortion is wrong no matter what