If a Famous Scientist set a Time Machine to Jesus' Crucifixion?

Question

....and stayed there for weeks, stealthily catching the divine events on hidden video as they occured?

And the time traveling was PROVEN and NOT disputed?

WHAT would be the REACTION to this actual recorded footage?

Oh--- and what if it revealed a VERY DIFFERENT reality from the way "The Passion of The Christ" movie looked!!

Answer 1

Well as soon as I can remake my mental enhancement memory helmet ( MEMH ) , I'll give you all those answers. It seems I made the first one 1/14th the size I needed and now I can't find my sliderule!

Stay tuned.

Answer 2

I still wouldn't believe. Plus, there would still be skeptics saying it's as fake as the moon landing.
Since you're asking hypothetical questions I'd like to ask one too. What if one day, a Christian group is excavating in the Holy Land and they are looking for early Christian artifacts, then by accident, they discover a tomb that says "Jesus of Nazareth, son of Joseph" and there is a body in there with Crucifixion wounds. What would be the reaction to that?
I feel people would still believe in Jesus and not leave Christianity.

Answer 3

I like the way you think...but it sounds like you're following some sort of prime-directive. Why just film it? Be a part of the News! Now that would be reality TV!

You could take your camera to the Roman Circus! Get right down there with the lions, and the Christians! Smell the blood, film the agony!

Or does all of this sound a little...(you fill in the blank)...

Answer 4

Well, my supposition would be that try as he might he would never find it. Since reality is that Jesus never existed, and was never put to death, and is nothing more than a myth, there would be nothing to film. The believers would continue to believe, the non-believers would have even more proof that he never existed and get even more frustrated with the dumb superstitions of the religious.

Now if your Time Traveling Scientist were to film the assassination of Ceasar, or the mighty Beowulf, precursor to Thor, would people begin to worship Jupiter or Thor again?

Answer 5

It would probably capture something completely different from what people expect to see... i don't believe it would lend any proof to the divinity of the story, but it may prove that Jesus in fact existed and that at least part of the story is true.

Answer 6

Yeah. Knowing this world they find some way to dispute it. Like no one noticed that Hesbalah was sending rocket into Israel before Israel started bombing them back. If people can't believe with the evidence before them they are not going to listen to anything they hear or see. You have to have an ear to hear and eye to see. Jesus gave them all they need the chose is thiers to make.

Answer 7

OK. and then let's suppose they park it ouside the tomb and after weeks of filming, nothing happens. Do you really think Christians are going to change their minds about a single solitary thing? You'll hear, for example:
"God didn't allow the sacred event to appear on film!" (TA DA!)

Answer 8

Remote viewers have reviewed the time. It's pretty well known outside of christian circles that a man named Simon, not Jesus, died on the cross that day. Jesus walked away and died of old age. The remote viewers have verified that.

Answer 9

If,if,if,if,if the biggest two letter word in the dictionary.Things would still be the same as today.
In Christ in Love,
TJ57

Answer 10

There was a rich man who died and went to hell. A poor man, who used to beg crumbs off his table, died and was comforted in Abraham's bosom. The rich man, in agony, asked Abraham to send him to his family, to warn them of the fate that awaited them. Abraham answered, "if they did not believe the prophets, they would not believe anyone even come back from the dead".

No amount of "evidence" can overturn a heart that will not believe.