According to me domasticating any animal and keeping it in our home bringing from wild is an biggest crime against animals forcing them to live a life which they are not from. Not only a crime against them also a crime against envirnment, creating a inbalance in ecosystem or food chain aviable on the earth.
Why not we built a huge home for them,which naturally gifted to them, Secure all the forest with huge hurdles keeping away from they prime enemy (HUMAN) allowing the animal lover only to watch this wonderfull creation of the earth.
By this, those who love animals will realy show they love towards them. Securing them in their own habitite.
2006-07-18 07:10:32 · 4 answers · asked by mysker v 2 in Pets ➔ Dogs
God created man, and He created dogs to be a friend and helper of man....You are correct in saying that wild animals should remain wild, but dogs are not wild...only the wild dogs, such as wolves, dingos and coyotes and others.
It would be wonderful to have sanctuaries for all wild animals.
2006-07-18 07:17:45 · answer #1 · answered by Chetco 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Dogs have been domesticated by mankind for tens of thousands of years. If we put them in a wild sanctuary, most of them would be killed by the local wildlife (bears, mountain lions, etc), or starve to death (I can't imagine a little 3 pound dog being able to hunt effectively).
If we put all the pet dogs back into the wild, it would create a severe imbalance just by doing that. Dogs would become food for predators, which would then multiply in number, and become a danger to people who live close to the wildlands. Moreover, when all the pet dogs were gone, the predators would have no more easy prey, and would do a number on the natural prey (rabbits, deer, etc) which would severely reduce the number of natural prey. Then most of the predators would starve to death, reducing the number of predators and restoring the natural balance.
I don't think that pet dogs are really pining away for the wild life, where every day is a struggle for survival. I know that my German Shepherd is more than content to sleep on my bed at night and eat the overpriced kibble that I buy her. Even when I leave the front door open, she hever leaves. Dogs have gotten so used to people providing for them, that they need us just as much as we need them.
As far as other animals (horses, cows, cats, etc), the same goes for them. They are so far removed from thier wild ancestors that they would be helpless in the wild.
Now I have to agree with you when it comes to currently undomesticated animals. It seems silly to try to domesticate wolves, lions, moose, etc. Normally it just results in a person being mauled to death. Wild animals don't need to be caged; they deserve to live out their lives in the manner that nature intended. But that doesn't apply to animals that have been domesticated for thousands of years, only the ones that are wild now.
2006-07-21 18:55:36 · answer #2 · answered by rita_alabama 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i anticipate you're speaking approximately at the instant wild animals, no longer canines, cats, cows, etc. it is a distinctive argument. yet why "fence" off the forests and habitat? Why no longer purely depart it the way it is meant to be? organic. only with the aid of putting up your "hurdles" you're changing the animals' organic habitat. only depart them on my own, thoroughly. And maximum animals' regularly occurring enemy isn't guy. maximum animals are the two killed with the aid of organic predators or die of the climate/starvation. it is even authentic of animals that people traditionally hunt, which includes deer. as an occasion, what proportion container mice are killed with the aid of guy as against hawks?
2016-11-02 07:08:18 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Uh...english NOT your first language?
VERY immature & TOTALLY UN-REALISTIC fantasy.
Further proof that the AR/peta/HUSU types are WAY out of touch w/reality.
2006-07-18 09:20:42 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋