Would Saddam Hussein be sleeping in the Lincoln bedroom with John Kerry serving him breakfast had Bush lost?

Answer 1

Amen Sr Citizen!

I don't think GW is flawless. I have seen him do and say some things that seemed less than great. But I do not think that either Gore or Kerry had the testicular fortitude to take out Saddam, and I think both of them would have been all too willing to yield to the international community.

So in short, I don't know if Saddam would have spent the night in the Lincoln bedroom, but he would sure be sleeping in one of his own palaces, still slaughtering his opposition,still torturing people, and still allowing his sons to terrorize, and still denying the UN access to his facilities.

So there.

Answer 2

Why would you ask such a stupid question? Haven't you seen the pictures of Rumsfeld and Saddam when Reagan was backing him against Iran? They are widely available on the internet.

Kerry went to Vietnam and fought our country's enemy, in person, with real bullets flying and everything - something that pu**y Bush cannot say. Therefore, why would you make the idiotic assumption that Kerry would be less inclined to defend our country than Bush? Are you that much of a moron, or just some little pre-teen poser who likes to act like an adult from the anonymity of a keypad?

Answer 3

First of all, I don't know what Lincoln's political alliances have to do with the format of your question, but anyway, I don't think Saddam would have been treated any differently over the last few years had Kerry been elected, although I did hear that they were secretly lovers. Kerry would have had no power over the court proceedings.

Answer 4

Pretty Much- Maybe not to that extreme.

Oh and Clifton- I bet if you could ask those 2,000 troops -who by the way volunteered for that job- full well knowing the risk- if you asked them if they would do it again- most of them would. Talk to most soldiers who have been to Iraq they will tell you how amazing this is. Besides I am sure we have lost a lot more in WW2 and I bet you think that we weren't wrong in that war- What about the Civil War and The revolutionary war? How many soldiers did we loose then? I suppose that since no life is worth it that we should go back to being ruled by England where it would be against the law to even be having this discussion. Remember if it had not been for America- none of the countries would be free. We set the stage.

Oh and while we are counting all the poor dead soldiers- lets not forget those 3,000+ people who were just minding their business 5 years ago, those innocent civilians who went to work and were just going about their normal lives when they were brutally murdered by terrorists who hate freedom. When you think of those 2,000 soldiers who died maybe you should ponder how many innocent civilians in America and Iraq and other nations in this world- how many lives have been saved because we have people who sttood up for freedom and have fought to protect us and our nation and to help another country enjoy the freedoms that everyone deserves.

Answer 5

God, no! And honest conservatives know that and are ashamed of the deceitful disrespect George II and his minions have shown their opponents.

But I do suspect that the Bush family are working with their Saudi friends and benefactors to make sure that Osama bin Laden is sleeping safely somewhere! Read Kevin Phillips, American Dynasty. (Phillips is a conservative who helped craft the "emerging Republican majority" that led to Nixon's and Reagan's triumphs.) The subtitle of his book is "Aristocracy, Fortune, and the Politics of Deceit in the House of Bush." Or read Craig Unger, House of Bush House of Saud. His data are even more unnerving. His subtitle is "The Secret Relationship Between the World's Two Most Powerful Dynasties."

What the Machiavellian Karl Rove and his neoconservative BigMoney tank are doing is using Hitler/Goebbels techniques to establish the Bushes as the Sauds of the USA.

God help us!

Answer 6

Nearly everyone misjudged Adolph Hitler's terrible potential, or failed to take him seriously, or even backed him. Hitler's regime was studied and emulated by Saddam Hussein. It took Winston Churchill and a few stalwart backers to bring the world to its senses. G.W. Bush may not be the greatest President who ever lived (and all of them have had some faults) but he is the Winston Churchill of the year 2006

Answer 7

Yes, maybe so, but over 2000 American Troops would still be alive; Ten thousand severely wounded troops would be whole; Three hundred billion would still be unspent; We would not have an army stuck on the ground in the Middle East; Our Veterans Hospitals would not be short of staff and money; our armies would not be filled with troops that could not pass the IQ test standards; The peace process in the Holy Land may still be quietly working; 50,000 thousand Iraqi's would still be alive; and thousands upon thousands of mothers and family members would not be grieving.

Which would you rather have?

Answer 8

Fantasy

There was never a chance that Bush would loose.

Kerry as a member of the Skull&Bones only agreed to run as a scam. If by some strange quirk he was ahead in the polls he agreed to let the Swift boat story knock him out of the running.

Answer 9

No. And last time I checked we werent really talking about Kerry any more. Your question is cute, but not as cute as this one ~ now that GW is in the white house, how many male prostitutes does he serve breakfast in bed to?

Answer 10

no. because George Bush had already renamed the Lincoln bedroom to the Haliburton bedroom