English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

6 megas and up anti-blurr and compact???????

2006-07-18 05:17:06 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Consumer Electronics Cameras

9 answers

In my opinion it is a silly question (No offence though, because it's THE most asked silly question) :-)
Now come to the point, imo u need to consider this way
1. more megapixel or less money
2. compact or great zoom level
3. more functionality or simple point & shoot

for compact design and good look (and of-course picture quality) i like nikon then sony,
for great zoom level and functionality I'll blindly choose fujifilm finepix SXXXX series.

But remember imo if u can spend a few extra bucks better go for canon whatever u choose....even though in some point nikons r better canon but at every other point canon's are better.

For more reading use articles in these sites
www.imaging-resource.com
www.steves-digicams.com

And remember there's nothing said best..happy hunting :-)

2006-07-18 06:28:03 · answer #1 · answered by Chamak 2 · 0 0

You have to choose between compact and high quality. Compact cameras are great for casual shots but lack all the good stuff a full sized camera has (for example, the "anti-blur", actually anti-shake technology you refer to).

The best digital camera currently is the Sony DSC-R1. It's a 10 megapixel camera with very advanced technology and a high quality lens.

If you are skilled in the technical aspect of photography, you can do better (for twice the price though) with a digital SLR camera. Canon makes the best ones. It is difficult for an unskilled photographer to take a good picture with an SLR. The R1, on the other hand, makes it pretty much idiot proof.

The R1 will run you about $800 total if you know where to shop. An entry level SLR kit will cost about the same. However, the lens that comes with it will suck. You won't be able to take decent pictures unless you buy a decent lens for it. Which will easily run you another $800.

For most people, the R1 is about as top of the line as it gets.

2006-07-18 05:39:22 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Canon Powershot SD700is... ohh and its not a stupid question because not everyones camera is the best... i sold cameras for over two years... and sony and kodak are for tools that dont know crap about cameras...fuji's are decent but a canon or a panasonic is the way to go for anti blur compact cameras... ohh and kodaks are not accurate at all... they have quite possibly the worst color chip on the market...my black pants come up blue in certain kodaks

2006-07-18 05:32:55 · answer #3 · answered by KP 1 · 0 0

Now that is a silly question, everybody will say theirs is the best.

I like Fuji but it is not to everybodys taste, go along to your nearest camera dealer and have a look ask their advice, pick a few up and handle them.

The best camera is the one that YOU are comfortable with.

Its no good getting one with all the bells and whistles if you aren't going to use it that much.

Get WHAT CAMERA and have a look in there.

http://www.fujifilm.co.uk/

http://www.fujifilm.com/

http://www.fujifilm.co.uk/digital/cameras/s7000/?lpage=/digital/cameras/range.php

This is the one I have the S7000.

2006-07-18 05:24:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Almost all of them are the best. Sony Cyber Shot (T-series) or Olympus are 2 of the best ones. But remeber to buy sth. that has a large LCD, at least 2" .

2006-07-18 05:49:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

everyone says sony is good, i don really object that.
but i find sony uses memory stick, that really puts me off because memory stick is one of the more expensive memory in the market.

so i prefer canon ixus 800 IS
the first model of canon ixus to have IS technology, it is anti-shake. also it features ISO 800 ISO800 and IS and flash used together can almost ensure ur picture is never blur. it is also compact

note that some brands feature anti blur in the form of forcing their ISO speed higher like 1600 3200 . no doubt it helps in reducing blur, but it generates alot of 'noise' in the sense your photo will look grainy and have 'spots' of wierd colours.

have fun choosing !

2006-07-18 07:05:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Sony Cybershot or Nikon

2006-07-18 05:46:11 · answer #7 · answered by PFX 3 · 0 0

Kodak Easyshares are very accurate.
Cnet.com reviews should take care of those questions.

2006-07-18 05:21:22 · answer #8 · answered by iahawke 4 · 0 0

Sony is the best

2006-07-18 05:20:04 · answer #9 · answered by Ω Nookey™ 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers