Should citizens who openly support the Al-Qaeda or any other terrorist organisation be deported even though they are not directly linked or involved in any, just openly supports (through protests).
Would this is unconstitutional-regarding civilian laws of freedom of speech?
2006-07-17 20:33:32 · 8 answers · asked by Tulip 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Civic Participation
This is a difficult one. On the one hand there is the question of free speech, but on the other hand there is the feeling, post 7/7, that any Al-Qaeda supporters are rubbing our faces in it. There was a big march in London last summer that made me feel like a vulnerable and targetted minority in my "own country".
Of course, British born muslims say that the UK is their country too. But if you are a supporter of Muslim Fundamentalist terrorism, then you have made your choice to be an enemy of the values of the UK.
I think that on balance I would be happier if they were deported. Try being a christian militant in Iran or Pakistan and see how the locals react.
I left London to move abroad, partly because of my belief that our traditions of tolerance etc were being sorely tested by terrorist supporting minorities. I think that Britain will soon reach a tipping point, and centuries of tolerance will be replaced by a real grass-roots anger. Rivers of Blood, anyone? I see no easy solution, and it is very sad.
2006-07-17 21:48:12 · answer #1 · answered by Big E 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I fully support this idea, BUT you must also deport ALL the other individuals out of the UK and EU who support the various terrorist factions such as the RIRA, CIRA, ETA, ELA, INLA and the list goes on. Only then it is FAIR.
In fact we can even designate a place called TERROR Island (pun intended) somewhere in the middle of the pacific ocean as their official prison / recreation centre / base of operations.
Remember, do not let the MOSQUITO across the ocean trouble you while the ELEPHANT is in front of your eyes.
2006-07-17 22:32:23 · answer #2 · answered by apakejadahnyaini 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Suspects should be first given their day in court. But when they are proven to be supporting or harboring terrorists, it is time for them to leave - through deportation.
2006-07-17 21:02:11 · answer #3 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's a touchy subject but a good idea. But if it ever passed there'd be no going back then they'd start deporting people for all kinds of things.
2006-07-17 20:39:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
little one,
That is not solving the problems.
Find out what cause them to be self lack of knowledge with miscommunication and communication failures with misinterpretation?
Then send them back to school that will be much cheaper with all the free trips for sending them home.
Find out why they are running away and abandoning ship of their on homeland.
Were they running away from the Mummy from the graveyards on planet earth.
2006-07-17 21:48:28 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe in freedom of speech but (for this question) I don't count because I'm American.
God bless our allies!
2006-07-17 22:16:59 · answer #6 · answered by grubblywrigglysquigglywitchety 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course not! Those who are involved in crimes must be arrested and put in prison, wheher it is about terror or shoplifting, but definitely not deported.
2006-07-17 21:03:01 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It may require some constitutional changes to do so but that is a great idea.
2006-07-17 20:36:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋