I believe in both. There is no reason not to believe that god isn't a driving force of evolution. However there is not reason to deny undeniable evidence of evolution.
2006-07-17 17:07:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by Nice man 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
Creation. man may adapt to certain things as will an animal but to evolve into a total other species, there is no proof of it ever happening. You can rig up some thing to look as if you have proof and it will even fool a lot of people but to have evolution as so many talk of it would have an example of each phase of the change of the species and there is no mid phase that has ever been found that would prove one species changed into another. Like Man coming from an ape? Where is the proof? Where are the mid phase specimens and why then would there still be apes just as they have been since Creation if they were to have changed into man since that was to be the better change? Evolution is there to get God out of the picture, nothing else. God Created this world, this universe, and everything in it, not some evolutionary bunk.
2006-07-17 16:39:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by ramall1to 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Creationism.
I severely dissagree with anyone who says both. If you read
Genesis 1 it clearly says that it didn't happen over 3 billion years.
Genesis 1:
5b And there was evening and there was morning, one day.
8b And there was evening and there was morning, a second day.
13 And there was evening and there was morning, a third day.
19 And there was evening and there was morning, a fourth day.
23 And there was evening and there was morning, a fifth day.
31b And there was evening and there was morning, the sixth day.
Did you catch that? Evening, Morning, Evening, Morning
, Evening, Morning, Evening, Morning, Evening, Morning, Evening, Morning. Not millions of years. Days. Thousands of years don't have evenings or mornings. The word used for day is the same one used all the rest of the book of Genesis. Did it rain for 40 million years while Noah was on the ark?
Are you calling the bible a liar? If Genesis lies, then what about the rest.
I think Theistic Evolution is fence-sitting. Jumping on a bandwagon. Science changes alot. Why abandon the solid truth of God to join on the fragile truth of science. Evolution may not be here in 50 years. God will.
Also in response to the Ape human similarity thing. THANK GOD (literally) FOR 2%! Who said god didn't use a template.
2006-07-17 16:44:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by chess19902000 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
For now, both. I believe in evolution as a natural process of a species' change over time as a means of adapting to its environment. However, I'm not sure that this same process applies to human beings (because of certain religious teachings), so that's why I believe in the divine creation of man, without any process of evolution.
2006-07-17 16:37:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think in God. i think in advent. i think in evolution. How can this be? a million. God is the 1st reason (the Intelligence in the back of 'clever layout.'). 2. advent: God is the author of all issues. 3. Evolution is misunderstood by way of a quirk of the English language. What do you think of once you hear: Evolution of the Species? Is the be conscious 'species' singular or plural? If the be conscious 'species' is singular what's the plural of species? In the two situations the be conscious is the comparable, "Species." And so human beings think of that as quickly right now of evolution of the species we are speaking approximately pass-species evolution. Evolution does ensue in spite of the shown fact that it purely occurs in the species. It does not pass species strains. occasion: A mama canines will continuously supply delivery to doggies no longer kittens. A mama cat will continuously supply delivery to kittens no longer doggies. Why is this? because of the fact all species are already created albeit no longer all species could yet be got here upon. whilst species are comparable adequate to have an interest in one yet another and mate the off-spring is mostly a hybrid. occasion: Male Donkey + woman Horse = Mule. Mules are sterile. technological know-how teaches that surely hybrids are born infertile. extra beneficial evidence that evolution does not pass species line. an person-friendly ancestor? nicely that is going back to a single species by some potential splitting into 2 seperate species... because hybrids are infertile how is that attainable? because of the fact of this i think in advent with God because of the fact the author and evolution a organic function of advent that works in the guy species to develop each specific species. This additionally explains why the two monkeys and adult men nonetheless exist. One did no longer evolve from the different. H
2016-11-02 06:21:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Intelligent design.
God doesn't even poof flowers into existence. He grows them gradually over time. As in the microcosm, so in the macrocosm.
Every work of art I've ever created has evolved over its creation too. As a creator, I understand the beauty and perfection in that.
Since God created everything, and science is the study of what exists, the differences between them must be misunderstandings.
There are three ways to seek the truth; three in one: Mind, Body, and Spirit - - or Philosophy, Science, and Religion.
They are all pieces of the "tri-force."
2006-07-17 16:42:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by sunflower_pyxie 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
well,
creation and evolution - ya in case of animals coz their brain has not been enhanced and over a period of time they needed to evolve to fight for their survival.
creation- in case of human beings, they were created and awarded an enhanced brain that could adapt to different situations and theory of evolution is proven false by God's sent books like the Quran and Bible. Man hasn't gone any evolution, he's the same as God created Adam n Eve.
2006-07-17 16:44:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by mobi 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Gen 1:1 "In the begining God created the heavens and the Earth..." IN Hebrew, the word for "Created" can also mean "RE-created". Before God created the world as we know it, there must have been something here. The Earth may very well have existed for millions of years with dinosaurs and neanderthals before he "re-created" Earth 6,000 years ago.
2006-07-17 16:36:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by David T 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
CREATION ONLY! 100% HUMAN
The earth was void in the beginning and god created the heavens and the earth!He created man,man was lonely then he created woman!If you believe in both then your saying your only 50% HUMAN,because evolution teaches us that we came from monkeys!Look in your mirror;Do you see 100% human or 50% monkey & 50% human if you see both I'd hate to be in your predicament! Evolution was taught only to keep people believing in it was GOD's Beautiful Creations!
2006-07-17 16:41:41
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your question isn't clear. If you mean evolution vs. six-day biblical creation than you can't possibly believe in both. If your implying that nature, including natural selection, was created than you would be making sense.
2006-07-17 16:35:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by kirbyguy44 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Evolution, but not that humans evolved from monkeys and apes. I believe humans were always a separate group.
Creation, no way. It's science on this one for me. Also, screw "Intelligent Design".
2006-07-17 16:34:31
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋