This is merly basic science. First, basic chemistry, looking at metablism, enzymes, energy & catalysis, large & small molecules. Also considering the reaction of pH & pKa & folaye..diverting carbonhydrates 12.0E-09, at which point displacement of amino acids & it's structures. Now using the kinetics curve as a calibration..equilibrium is contant for sucrose HELLO!!!..the ionization of acetic acid occures with carbonhydration within metabolism. This is all done with little modification that any 3rd rate biologist could determine the complexity to be irredducible..of course I'm taking into account that photosynthesis, pH & pKa are clinical and used with correlates..DUH!!!!!!!
You see it's very simple..any questions!
2006-07-17
13:09:50
·
19 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
GEEEZZZZZZ..I don't have a clue what I said...LOL!!!! I thought you might get a kick out of that mombo-jumbo
2006-07-17
15:06:44 ·
update #1
Well, duh indeed my son. You've said a great deal but not said a lot. You still need to factor in the lenght of God's day...which I might add is not the same as temporal "day"; therefor, you're "theory" is lacking in an essential denominator.
Personally, Mom finds room for both evolution and creationism in the one phrase..."just how long is God's day?" Have a good one. Study hard.
2006-07-17 13:18:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by Mama Otter 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
thought plants only used photosynthesis. so, where'd the plant come from. besides, it has yet to actually work in a "lab" at all. It's flawed. Also, any good scientist, is good in math. Therefore. DO the math for the chance of everything / people / [lants / animals / insects and fish, well, just happened. Once you find the fact that it's mathmatically nearly impossible, then go back and figure it had to happen for male and female.
2006-07-17 13:18:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Stand in front of a mirror. Check for any swelling on the scrotal skin.
Examine each testicle with both hands. Place the index and middle fingers under the testicle with the thumbs placed on top. Roll the testicle gently between the thumbs and fingers -- you shouldn't feel any pain when doing the exam. Don't be alarmed if one testicle seems slightly larger than the other, that's normal.
2006-07-17 13:14:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Creationism is now no longer taught in public faculties. the only place the place that's allowed to examine is inner maximum Christian faculties. notwithstanding creationism is banned from public faculties, I did have a extreme college biology instructor at my public extreme college in the U.S. teach us some thing referred to as "smart layout" - some style of concept that "fills in the blanks" with God as an answer to each thing that technology can not teach. He became right into a fundamentalist, and located loopholes in the direction of the ban via coaching us what he believed to be genuine ("creationism" and "smart layout") as THEORIES, insisting that via fact evolution is an thought, all theories could be offered. He not at all instructed us one became into precise over the others, yet instructed us to examine the data and to make our very own judgements as to which concept we supported. i became into in straightforward terms 14 while he taught this lesson, and that i became into impressionable adequate to have self assurance that smart layout became right into a respected perception. Now that i'm older and understand greater of the data, i'm annoying via the certainty that this sort of training would be usual in the U.S. public college gadget.
2016-10-08 01:00:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by fritch 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
dude you are so barking up against the 'faith' experince. these people are LAZY of course as they don't have to bring evidence or be consistent or suffer rigorous scrutiny with any of their 'faiths'. good luck, you're doing yoemans work. creationists have nothing to offer of course but mob mentality catchism. they really should try to take responsibility for their own lives and decisions. our nation and our country would benefit with more efforts like yours.
2006-07-17 13:27:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by emptiedfull 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
here'swhat I want to know for those whose argument for ID is "complexity"
if we were created intelligently, WHY would we need to be complex?
why wouldn't we just be one walking, talking blobous mass?
just a thought.
also I like the sneers and jeers against science here.
the name calling and the infintile "mommy" remarks.
good solid comeback, guys.
Do you think God wants you fighting on his side with asinine remarks like these?
2006-07-17 13:21:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by lyleaux 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Do your mommy and daddy know you're using those big grown up words? You better be careful mister!!
2006-07-17 13:12:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by Report Abuse 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree. It is so elegant that only God could have conceived of it. Brillant!
2006-07-17 13:33:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by James E 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i was in doubt, but i learned so much,
now i'm not even sure anymore
2006-07-17 13:51:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by duhman 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
So you are saying you evolved from plankton sh-it. Right?
2006-07-17 13:14:23
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋