It can save lives.
2006-07-17 11:54:20 · 12 answers · asked by Tommy D 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Civic Participation
I have Multiple Sclerosis - this offers HOPE to me and others afflicted with this disease.
2006-07-17 11:59:21 · update #1
Bush said he WILL VETO.
2006-07-17 12:46:30 · update #2
Bush has his head up his @ss on most things.
2006-07-17 11:57:16 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
No, even though it sometimes seems so, Bush is not the most senseless president we have ever had. Yes, when asked what should we do to prevent forest fires, he suggested we cut down trees. As crazy as it sounds, it is the best solution by far. (You can ask me more about that if you really want to know; if not, take a science and society class and you will understand). And yes, stem cells can save lives, but it is also a question of ethics and morality. I am pro-stem cell research because I think it is really beneficial, and I do not have a religion, but that is just me. Other people just so happen to believe that whenever you extract stem cells from unborn baby, you're destroying a life.
2006-07-17 19:02:06 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Stem Cell Research
2006-07-17 20:43:19 · answer #3 · answered by tough as hell 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I really hate to agree with George Bush about anything, but someone has to stand up for the fact that maybe it's just wrong to create and destroy potential human life for the benefit of others. I would like to see more funding focused on adult stem cell research.
2006-07-17 19:00:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There was a recent admission by a Stem Cell Reaseacher that they falsified their data to get stronger emotional and monitary support.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10811959
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10589085
The House and the Senate hold the wallet in this, don't blame the big guy.
Could it be you are just a Bush basher and you're looking at any angle to get a bashing in?
2006-07-17 19:04:00 · answer #5 · answered by answer annie 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
he trying to give in to the rightwinger.reagan was against stem cell now he wife and son are for it.If a family of bush could be save by it he change his mind in a minute
2006-07-17 18:59:56 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Changing genetics has the potential to do great good as well as great harm. The good thing is that the wheels are turning, how ever slow and cautious they may be, to the betterment of humanity.
2006-07-17 19:29:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Whether it is his personal point of view or an attempt to pacify the religious right,it is within his office to do so .I disagree though. It can be overridden by enough votes in Congress. Peace.
2006-07-17 20:21:37 · answer #8 · answered by wildrover 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it doesn't matter what he thinks...human curiosity and science can not be stopped....cloning and stem cell research will continue no matter what.
2006-07-17 18:57:54 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
See Karen's answer above !
2006-07-17 18:58:07 · answer #10 · answered by sanambrosio 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋