Should Intelligent Boyancy (IB) theory be taught in public schools instead of aerodynamics?

Question

Intelligent Boyancy theory says that lighter than air travel is only possible as the result of intelligent agents. Airplanes work because intelligent people make them work. Birds work because they have intelligence (although not souls!). According to this latest scientific theory, that's why Santa's sleigh is able to fly, because both Santa and the reindeer are intelligent. Aerodynamics fails to explain how Santa's sleigh can fly and is therefor a religion.

Why shouldn't this IB theory be taught as well?

Answer 1

When we asked a team of scientists at Kansas U. if they thought penguins and dodos were "intelligent," they invariably said "no!" Their answers, and the fact that they cannot fly, leaves no doubt in our minds that your theory makes more sense than the so-called "aerodynamic theory." (Which, I might add, is NEVER mentioned in Genesis.)

We in the Leftovershoe, Kansas, Board of Education don't think this should be treated with levity. In the words of President Bush Students should be "taught the controversy" . We intend to bring up IB before the curriculum committee for inclusion.

Answer 2

Schools also need to cast off the priesthood of dogmatically atheist plumbers. The plumber who came by recently refused to accept that the clog in my drain was caused by an evil spirit, instead looking only for a naturalistic explanation. Sure, he removed a bunch of hair and gunk, and the sink started working again, but that's no reason to reject my religion like that! I demand that Intelligent Clogging be taught in schools, but it isn't. Help, I'm being oppressed!

Answer 3

Thank God IB has such a strong advocate in you! Preach on, brother! Myself, I've been working on a theory of Intelligent Decomposition. You know, how would a thing know how to deconstruct into its constituent elements unless it were told by a higher intelligence?

Answer 4

Santa's sleigh? Well if you made those ski things at the bottom big enough wouldn't it work then? I guess since it cannot be explained it must be IBT

Answer 5

while some of your questions are funny, this isn't one of your more intelligent ones. It is evident that you don't know much about intelligent design theory. Whatever. Its your life and you can stay blissfully ignorant if you want to.

Answer 6

I think it absolutely should be. I think we should also teach Intelligent Falling (god PULLS us to the earth) as an alternative to gravity, and we should teach the stork theory as an alternative to the atheistic "childbirth" theory.

Answer 7

i presumed we were education it below the recent criteria that we are compelled to below no (meaning each) newborn left in the back of. ECLB typically demands the dumbing down of coaching to income the bottom tutorial pupil (which it would not) on the reducing of criteria for the brighter scholars.

Answer 8

All aerodynamics is the result of the FSM.