2006-07-17 08:49:27 · 17 answers · asked by enlight100 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Uhh ... miracle?
God is cool that way -- he can do the impossible.
2006-07-17 08:52:55 · answer #1 · answered by creton4 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its been a number of hours because you published this, so i'm useful with the aid of now some one has stated that the hot testomony replace into written in Greek. The be conscious for brother, adelphos, is rooted interior the be conscious meaning from the comparable womb. whilst it is used in a non secular experience or to instruct a mutual bond, you may nonetheless tell with the aid of the context. some human beings recommend that the brothers and sisters of Jesus, stated interior the bible, have been genuinely cousins, yet there's a Greek be conscious for cousins, anepsios. Matthew a million:25 calls Jesus uion prototokon, first born. If he replace into the only son born of Mary, it could desire to have been written uion monogene. In John 19, whilst Jesus tells the disciple whom he enjoyed approximately Mary, it says he took her into his very own from that hour. The be conscious spouse and young ones, as in His very own spouse and young ones is italicized because of the fact it is no longer interior the text textile. could desire to it recommend into his very family or care, or coronary heart? John, the apostle whom Jesus enjoyed, replace into from Galilee, and the crucifixion handed off in Jerusalem. 40 days later, interior the top room, in Acts a million Mary is asserted to be there with Jesus' brothers, so it could look that the loved disciple's care of her replace into no longer necessary.
2016-11-02 05:45:24 · answer #2 · answered by garion 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think this is a sticking point between Christianity and many others -- it's a semantic issue, not a religious one.
In ancient times, a virgin was an unmarried woman.
A chaste woman was one who had never "known a man."
The virgin Mary was indeed unmarried. It is never mentioned that she was chaste.
2006-07-17 09:40:25 · answer #3 · answered by maeves_child 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Plain and simple, science doesn't seek to explain those things.
2006-07-17 08:52:55 · answer #4 · answered by DR 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jehovah God put Holy Spirit into Mary and then Jesus Christ was born. not God, Jehovah's son. how can so many stupid people think that it never happend. they are real real stupid. because it did happen. wake up stupid people
2006-07-17 08:53:49 · answer #5 · answered by lover of Jehovah and Jesus 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Artificial insemination?
2006-07-17 08:52:59 · answer #6 · answered by Damian 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Science can not prove, or disprove, an article of faith.
2006-07-17 09:03:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It can't, that's the whole point! It's a matter of faith, you see, to believe what would otherwise be unbelievable.
2006-07-17 08:53:28 · answer #8 · answered by davidangelrt 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well... duh... science CAN'T explain the 'Birth of Jesus' to 'Virgin Mary'. For one very good reason... it never happened.
2006-07-17 08:53:13 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's called a miracle.
2006-07-17 08:53:57 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋