English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Seeing as how he doesn't have any lust at all, doesn't that make him just as hetero as he is homo?

2006-07-17 07:40:59 · 38 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

38 answers

yah i think asexual is the word.

2006-07-17 07:44:18 · answer #1 · answered by truthyness 7 · 1 0

God isn't hetero nor homo. Neither is He male or female. And He doesn't lust. He's not a human so he doesn't have any of those qualities.
Don't ask why we refer to God as "He," but I know it doesn't have anything to do with sexual orientation or identity.

2006-07-17 07:48:28 · answer #2 · answered by ATWolf 5 · 0 0

It is my opinion and that only that if it exists then God knows about it. As a man my mind is dulled from the full knowledge of the universe. As such I take it on faith that the nature of things is in good hands. It is my job to love myself and others. This is the best way to live I feel. Judging is required in life but I can focus on whats usually good and reliable and steer clear of what doesn't work. I have found much peace this way. Its is now biologically proven that homosexuality can be genetic in origin. This is significant. The bible I feel is an inspired writing however a lot of it must be of man's doing as it contradicts itself often. Take the good and leave the rest. I just know God (or whatever His/Her/Its name is) loves me a lot as I see the work of this genius daily. Peace......Stew

2006-07-17 07:53:33 · answer #3 · answered by Stew 3 · 0 0

He sure gave Mary a good seeing to. If He had impregnated Joseph, that would have been both evidence of His homosexuality and a much more impressive demonstration of His devine power. I think next time round He should definitely go for a male host. I for one, would find it to be far more persuasive proof of His existence. So long as he doesn't choose me. Deity or not, my sphincter is strictly a one way street.

2006-07-17 07:49:41 · answer #4 · answered by fiend_indeed 4 · 0 0

We are not defined (well, at least not all of us) by our lusts. God is so far beyond man's ability to fully comprehend that your question is meaningless, other than being a double negative.

2006-07-17 07:45:13 · answer #5 · answered by But why is the rum always gone? 6 · 0 0

God if there is one doesn't give a bleep who anyone sleeps with so being straight or homo is irrelevant...What is relevant to God is LOVE.

2006-07-17 07:44:41 · answer #6 · answered by thebigm57 7 · 0 0

Weirdo

2006-07-17 07:42:38 · answer #7 · answered by italianprincess_fl 3 · 0 0

That's sort of like saying "Seeing how Joe is a registered independent voter, doesn't that make him just as much a Democrat as he is a Republican?"

In other words, you're way off the mark.

2006-07-17 07:45:38 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

God created lust. He just wants us to be responsible with it.

2006-07-17 07:45:20 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

He is not in human form. The theory is he is in spiritual form and has no such desire. That is one thing about heaven that is interesting no sex.

Unless you consider the 1,000 years of peace after Revelations which is heaven on earth as heaven. Just FYI.

2006-07-17 07:43:42 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

lust is a sin. so is homosexuality. God is perfect. God does not have the desires of the flesh. sin and God cannot co-exist.

2006-07-17 07:43:34 · answer #11 · answered by He is in control 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers