The US does not attack countries that can defend themselves.
2006-07-16 23:16:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by Left the building 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Let's see ever heard of the Cold War???? North Korea ever heard of the Korean War (which was a part of the Cold War)....trade sanctions, diplomatic measures have been taken in the past and present for those countries. Iraq had it own issues how many Arab countries supported Saddam Hussan and the Bathe party other than Syria? (which are now under sanction by the US economic sanctions) Currently we talk and dialog with Russia, China the Cold War is over.....Hmmmm. It is not any Middle Eastern county per say but Terrorist groups and those that support them- militias that rove around the world causing the problems (and US policy I do agree) but still just think about Lebanon did it declare the war with the Israeli's? Did government troops bomb and kidnap troops? Shoot the missiles across the UN international border? No it was a TERRORIST MILITIA! This is not a traditional war like the Cold War, Korean War was. These folks hide in civilian populations and battle and disappear into them. If The Arab world stamped down and stopped miltias from practicing\declaring jahids I doubt Israel, or the US and it's Allies would be in the Middle East, about not attacking countries that can defend themselves let's see has anyone wanted a Nuclear War?
2006-07-16 23:45:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
This is not a religion or spiritual question...it's political.
They are already attacking Iraq is too expensive attack North Korea, China and Russia at the same time. Step by step they might get there too.They only have to drop 3 or 4 nuclear bombs and all are resolved for them as in Japan.
2006-07-16 23:20:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
because the way Bush thinks 'if he can he will' as we seen in Iraq no 'scary weapons' no real army, just poor Innocent people, and he knew that from the beginning. Plus he had the pudding in the end 'oil' and human organs which were sold and still being sold to the rich. So with all these profit and nothing to loose, why put himself at risk by attacking the stronger countries also he was evil enough to do it on the top of all these.
2006-07-16 23:32:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by DejaVu 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I do agree with Bent. Furthermore because they aren't united. North Korea is not a rich country : China & Russia are as evil as America
2006-07-17 00:28:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by RBB 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
we can attack all of those and have.
north korea-we pushed all the way to the chinese border before pulling back to the 38th parallel
china-boxer rebellion
russia-1917 we invaded northern russia just after the revolution to help protect the "white russians"from lenins purge.
besides middle eastern countries are usually less than third world countries.
2006-07-16 23:21:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by glock509 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
i imagine China ought to help shield NK if it were attacked, yet when Korea became the instigator of a conflict hostile to a much better u . s . a . like the U. S., I make certain that China ought to take a seat on its palms and enable NK get wiped off the map.
2016-10-14 21:22:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The last time the US was engaged in any kind of military action against a country with a significant military was in WWII... and they got fed up with fighting and dropped the bomb.
2006-07-16 23:20:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by smokingun 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is not that we can't ,they just have not attacked us yet.Terrorists funded and supported by those in the middle east have.
2006-07-16 23:41:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by Tommy G. 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I liked JT's answer too.
P.S. does anyone else notice that JT looks like Tariq Aziz without the big square glasses?
lol, sorry Jt, I coulnd't resist. Put your picture back up...
2006-07-16 23:23:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋