A Christian friend of mine showed me the Gospel of Thomas, what is your take on it?

Question

My friend likes to reasearch the older beliefs and texts of her faith. She is the one I mentioned that wears a Christian Pentacle. Well she showed me The Gospel of Thomas today and I found it kind of surprising. I would like to know what is your view on it. I am a Solitary Eclectic, but I used to be a Catholic and its not anything like I was tought in Catholic School. I know it is a contraversial topic, but I just want an honest opinion.

Answer 1

The Gospel of Thomas is heretic, it's a Gnostic text and is very misleading - it does not reveal who the true and historical Jesus Christ really is and it also "underestimates" God for who He is.

The Gnostics would think that salvation only comes to those who have the knowledge of the divine. The Gnostic gospels were not included in the cannon because these texts were not inspired by the Holy Spirit and were contradicting to many other reliable sources in the cannon books in many ways.

One of the things mentioned in the Gnostic gospels was that Jesus told his disciples to cut the wood, lift the rock and they can find him there. They also mentioned that Jesus said that the women should be transformed to men so that they can enter heaven. This is absolutely absurd; because the historical Jesus Christ did not say such things.

P/s: The Gospel of Thomas and the Gospel of Judas are the same in terms of their content - Gnostic texts.

Answer 2

Did you read the part where Jesus supposedly told his disciples that women couldn't enter into the kingdom of Heaven and so they should pray for Him to transform them into men?

The gospel of Thomas is what is known as a gnostic gospel. There were various editions of these heretical documents circulating in the first couple of centuries. While they may have contained some factual information, they were not divinely inspired and they have no place in the cannon of Scripture.

Answer 3

all the gosples are the comparable age they have been recieted at our ealry hundreds via people who had perrsonally wlaked with Jesus, as an occasion if St. John have been haveinng mass -- the breaking of the bread -- he might arise or actully take a seat in those days with the congregation status and recite a number of his fdirect expereience with Jesus, this later became into written down via St. John and became into blanketed in the Bible via the Holy See. The Gosple in accordance to Thomas became into reviewed and did no longer make, yet there have been some standards, the artwork had to be genuine and it had to be authentically written via the Holy sprit in the direction of the observer, subsequently St. Thomas. for wahtever reason the Gosple in accordance to St. Thomas did no longer bypass the rigours tests necessary to be canonized as holy scripture. that does no longer propose those and different writings that did no longer bypass have not got value, yet they do no longer seem to be holy scripture. From the outset, the 4 Gospels, the sacred character of which became into for this reason recognised very early, differed in numerous respects from the distinctive uncanonical Gospels which circulated in the time of the 1st centuries of the Church. first of all, they cautioned themselves via their tone of simplicity and truthfulness, which stood in marvelous assessment with the trivial, absurd, or for sure mythical character of lots of those uncanonical productions. for frhter examine click on the link under.

Answer 4

This so-called "gospel" was dealt with over 1300 years ago. It was one of the Gnostic gospels that was not considered to be the True Word of God. These Gnostic gospels were not inspired by the Holy Spirit thus the Church did not include them as Holy Scripture.

May God bless you on your journey :-)

Answer 5

Quit smoking that crack and wake up. there is NO book of Thomas in the Holy Bible.

Answer 6

terrific Book - outstanding Wisdom. very supportive of the rest of the Books.