USA did this to IRAQ and AFGANISTAAN only by one attack on them 9/11.
But india is facing it for last 50 years...
2006-07-16 19:10:57 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
The onlyreason Americans dared to attack Iraq orAfghanistan is that these countries didn't have nukes. Just the thought of Nkorea attacking them makes them pee in their pants.
Pakistanis devoid of any notions of morality( Let's faceit, who would kill innocent people asa state policy? And they keep on doing it, thereis ample proof, along with satallite images of training camps) .
Besides they are really perverted, in that they refused to take back the bodies of their soldiers who died in Kargil, trying to maintain that Pakistan was not involved. Like what sort of a country is it, that denies their soldiers the right to be buried in its soil? Indians had to bury them. Ugh.
Anyways, with La.whore being so close to border, PAkistan being a small country fullof breast-beating ISlamic zealots and a rogue state with no morality, would be the first to drop their chinese nuclear bomb on India. Ifthey have not sold every one of their bombs to ALQaida, Iran or whatever country they have been selling nukes to.
MODIFY: Condemning Forsooth. They did it with a wink. Considering that they like bombing trains, I don't understand why buses and trains continue to run between Delhi and La.whore?
WhatIndia needs is tight border patrolling, spy sattelites to detect any movement of Jehadis in border areas. They all recieve their training in Pakistan. If Pakistan hadn't taught them Electronics, they wouldn't be able totime it anyways.
I say, infiltrate Pakistan , and kill a few Pakis every time something happens in India.
2006-07-16 19:24:15 · answer #1 · answered by shrek 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
No it should not , it has to try to help curent regime in Pakistan, because if this regime goes islamic militants are going to take power, and India will be forced to get in an war which could easily end in nuclear war.
Another reason is India still thinks in clasical war theory, in a war with Pakistan , there will be no winner only atrition of forces, that means a lot of casualitys on both side even if no one uses nuclear weapons. You expect of India to take Pakistan just like USA did take Iraq , but you forgett that USA is leading in military traingin and equipement be miles before everybody else.
So my suggestion is peacefull solution.
Another reason is that muslim minority in India is the biggest in the world with more then 300 000 000 if I am not wrong , do you think that they will take this peacefully.
Make peace, fight terrorists, get better education, more food and water for population, and leave war option alone.
2006-07-17 02:40:15 · answer #2 · answered by haruvatu 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
India and Pakistan are too big and powerfull to attack each other (unless you'd like other countries to benefit from your war)
India needs to create "Iron Wall" that would make sure that no terrorist activity can be conductied on its territory (without becoming militarized dictature)
Main idea and task for the whole world - we need to find a way to de-radicalize Islam and convert it into peaciful religion - similar to what was done with Christianity long time ago
2006-07-17 03:00:25 · answer #3 · answered by RonW 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"Peace is key". What did US gain through the attacks?
In my opinion, diplomatic channels should be more aggressive and International Peace organizations should divert their attention towards the Kashmir issue.
A resolution is a must and that too soon. War is NOT the answer!!
2006-07-17 02:17:11 · answer #4 · answered by Avatar 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i believe we all must attack terrorism where it lives. India has a right to self defense too.
2006-07-17 02:22:21 · answer #5 · answered by RunningOnMT 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, not for the latest attack on Bombay. No sooner had the dust settled than Pakistan was out there condemning the people who did it.
2006-07-17 02:13:37 · answer #6 · answered by Tim 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is a rather different case to fly troops and equipment half way across the world and invade a fairly defenseless country than to invade a neibouring country when they have more matched armies and both have nukes.
2006-07-17 02:57:00 · answer #7 · answered by Kenneth H 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes i think india should attack pak
but not today
because india dont want its economy to be get hauled
nad attract more anger from us
2006-07-17 02:15:53 · answer #8 · answered by mandar b 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In consideration of the fact that Pakistan is Muslim and
India is Hindu, it would probably be a good idea in the long run.
2006-07-17 02:14:55 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, go get them.
Shut up Shrek, You wouldn't say that to an American's face.
2006-07-17 02:36:04 · answer #10 · answered by phwar68 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋