English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-07-16 18:56:20 · 14 answers · asked by Theta40 7 in Society & Culture Languages

Is it correct?

2006-07-16 19:00:27 · update #1

what if instead of hair is "pencil"? pencil is not collective noun

2006-07-16 19:03:56 · update #2

yes it helps

2006-07-16 20:20:31 · update #3

14 answers

Danny,

Plural: Look at these students' hair
Plural: Look at these students' pencil (if they share one single pencil)
or
Plural: Look at these students' pencils (more than one pencil in the group of students)
Helps?

2006-07-16 20:19:49 · answer #1 · answered by vim 5 · 1 1

Hair (collective noun)

Look at this student's hair.
Look at these students' hair.

Pencil (not a collective noun)

Look at this student's pencil.
Look at these students' pencils.

2006-07-16 19:11:28 · answer #2 · answered by Raymond C 4 · 0 0

"Look at these students' hair."

"Hair" is a collective noun like "water" so even if you are referring to several heads, you still would say hair, not hairs.

Unless you are comparing individual hairs from the various students. In that case your example would be correct. But don't forget the apostrophe.

2006-07-16 19:02:48 · answer #3 · answered by surlygurl 6 · 0 0

i don't understand precisely what this man or woman meant yet i understand that many sturdy instructors have been intuitive. My mom taught for variety of 30 years before she became a primary and then an affiliate professor. She replace into usual, gained coaching awards, and her scholars incorporate an Academy Award documentary producer, 2 Rhodes scholars, and a number of MIT grads. besides to coaching "proficient" young ones, she taught the "in threat" young ones and mentored them to achievement. This replace into all secondary coaching, which for my section is plenty harder than uncomplicated in some techniques. To immediately her "young ones" nonetheless write her letters and phone her.... My mom could desire to tell whilst a newborn replace into grasping the fabric. She could desire to even see what style of learner a newborn replace into...no be counted if seen, auditory, etc., only with the aid of finding. And my husband has an uncle who can do wonders with a bulldozer or any style of equipment. Please do no longer attempt to tell experts what they are able to and can't do. people who understand their craft or commerce or corporation nicely can do many "stunning" issues.

2016-11-02 04:55:17 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It is an awkward sentence to begin with. No one talks like that. Try rearranging the sentence. "Look at the hair on these students." When you do that, it tells you how to pluralize the original sentence, if you so choose to use it.

2006-07-16 19:30:59 · answer #5 · answered by bloomquist324 4 · 0 0

in plural it's "look at these students' hair" and "look at these students' pencils"

2006-07-17 01:29:24 · answer #6 · answered by Natasha 2 · 0 0

look at the hair of these students. hair is plural.

2006-07-16 20:28:03 · answer #7 · answered by Michele W 1 · 0 0

look at the hair of all these students

2006-07-16 19:24:26 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

"hairs" sounds funny to me. i would rephrase it to avoid awkwardness. for example, "look at the hair on these students!" or something. or if you want to keep the same kind of phrasing, i would probably say "look at these students' hair." it just seems more correct to me.

2006-07-16 19:03:35 · answer #9 · answered by Tarah 2 · 0 0

No its wrong,you could say ,Look at those students hair.

2006-07-16 19:02:06 · answer #10 · answered by dumplingmuffin 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers