No, I believe he was not fuzy.
2006-07-16 17:30:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by Annabanana 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Fuzy wuzy, of course, was a very fuzy wuzy bear with no hair, but was fuzy wuzy anyways because, I mean look, it's named fuzy wuzy!
Er, on the more serious side, bears with no hair have fur, which works just as well?
2006-07-16 17:06:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by Shira 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nope, he got caught in a mad shaver incident and was buzzed from head to foot. We are hoping for a speedy regrowth but he is getting some good bucks for participation in a Rogain-type research program so he is not in any rush. Does this answer your question? Good question!!
2006-07-16 17:05:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by roritr2005 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you don't have hair (like me) you are not fuzy
2006-07-16 17:11:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by Don M 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
no they just named him fuzy wuzy so it sounded like he had hair.
2006-07-16 17:06:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by sexycouture1 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Fuzzy Wuzzy was a cat
Fuzzy Wuzzy was really fat
Fuzzy Wuzzy was so wide, she rolled over on her side. . . . .
a silly little ditty my brother made up about our cat when he was bored. And fuzzy has 2 z's
2006-07-16 17:06:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Inky binky bonky my daddy had a donkey the donkey died daddy cried inky binky bonky
2006-07-16 17:04:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by pottersclay70 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Haha! My grandpa used to say that all the time!
2006-07-16 17:08:05
·
answer #8
·
answered by S. K. 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Fuzzy Wuzzy was his name wasn't it?
As to your question, no. I suppose not.
2006-07-16 17:04:35
·
answer #9
·
answered by what'sthat?! 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
He was until he got a hold of his wife's razor!!
2006-07-16 17:06:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by calgal 5
·
0⤊
0⤋