English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

16 answers

No, I believe he was not fuzy.

2006-07-16 17:30:40 · answer #1 · answered by Annabanana 4 · 0 0

Fuzy wuzy, of course, was a very fuzy wuzy bear with no hair, but was fuzy wuzy anyways because, I mean look, it's named fuzy wuzy!

Er, on the more serious side, bears with no hair have fur, which works just as well?

2006-07-16 17:06:07 · answer #2 · answered by Shira 2 · 0 0

Nope, he got caught in a mad shaver incident and was buzzed from head to foot. We are hoping for a speedy regrowth but he is getting some good bucks for participation in a Rogain-type research program so he is not in any rush. Does this answer your question? Good question!!

2006-07-16 17:05:57 · answer #3 · answered by roritr2005 6 · 0 0

If you don't have hair (like me) you are not fuzy

2006-07-16 17:11:56 · answer #4 · answered by Don M 1 · 0 0

no they just named him fuzy wuzy so it sounded like he had hair.

2006-07-16 17:06:14 · answer #5 · answered by sexycouture1 2 · 0 0

Fuzzy Wuzzy was a cat
Fuzzy Wuzzy was really fat
Fuzzy Wuzzy was so wide, she rolled over on her side. . . . .
a silly little ditty my brother made up about our cat when he was bored. And fuzzy has 2 z's

2006-07-16 17:06:39 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Inky binky bonky my daddy had a donkey the donkey died daddy cried inky binky bonky

2006-07-16 17:04:52 · answer #7 · answered by pottersclay70 6 · 0 0

Haha! My grandpa used to say that all the time!

2006-07-16 17:08:05 · answer #8 · answered by S. K. 3 · 0 0

Fuzzy Wuzzy was his name wasn't it?
As to your question, no. I suppose not.

2006-07-16 17:04:35 · answer #9 · answered by what'sthat?! 2 · 0 0

He was until he got a hold of his wife's razor!!

2006-07-16 17:06:08 · answer #10 · answered by calgal 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers