English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i do.i think as long as a marshal law government isn't in the picture, their should be an Army branch or Marine that just deals with gangs like the crips and blood and any other what do you think. and i give it like 3 days with full lock and load and there wouldn't be any gang in the US.

2006-07-16 07:14:22 · 14 answers · asked by SLICK77 3 in Politics & Government Law Enforcement & Police

i understand is against US laws but i was in the army and i think if we "bend the rules" one way we can other example it also states a us military person will not serve under another countries or groups flag but what do you call NATO and UN?

2006-07-16 07:24:22 · update #1

oh come gangs like crips ever coming close to US military power that is too unreal for me lol they don't have the support, money or people wake up don't be a retard

2006-07-16 07:26:12 · update #2

14 answers

I think what this country needs is a federal police force and that the gangs should be considered terrorists.

I also believe that the regular police force could do a much better job if the courts did a better job. I find that fines and sentences are far too light for the crimes commited. I believe punishments should be so severe that just the though of suffering the punishment would be a deterent to commiting the crime.

Right now the prisons are too easy on criminals. Some locked-up criminals say they have it easy in prison. Some that have been released say they want to go back! Now that's entirely too easy!!

Prison should be an absolute HELL HOLE. No air conditioning, no heating, no hot meals, no television, no game room, no recreation room, cold showers only, no outside visitors, no creature comforts of any kind, no phone calls, only letters (that are monitored) from immediate family, must work hard labor to earn food and anything else needed, and a daily reminder of why they are where they are.

2006-07-16 07:41:03 · answer #1 · answered by swm_seeks_sf 3 · 0 0

seems that there are some interior the Marine Corps. A courtroom-martial only wrapped up in Okinawa. An MA2 assigned to Naval activities at White coastline replace into convicted of soliciting a Marine Sergeant to kill the lady chum of that woman sailor. The Marine replace right into a "Crips Lord" and alter into the god son of "Tookie" Williams who started the Crips gang.

2016-11-02 04:14:53 · answer #2 · answered by hartzell 4 · 0 0

I don't know, but I do know that if the libs don't even want the National Guard on the southern border, they're not going to go for that.

See what I mean? Marines "butcher." I wonder what they say the crips and bloods do?

2006-07-16 07:18:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Perhaps the National Guard can give assistance and support to the local police, but I have a serious issue with using active duty soldiers for domestic issues. You never ever want to bring them in if you can help it. That is not their purpose. You don't want to set precedence on this one.

2006-07-16 07:25:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i don't think so if you were to try to stop gangs but an act of force i think that it would just make the gangs become more organized to overcome the military, and in result would be alot of unsolved crimes. not that there isn't already but i don't think it would make the problem better.

2006-07-16 07:22:17 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Absolutely not. The military is NOT a police force. Gangs are bad, but need to be dealt with by police officers, not Marines who are trained to butcher their enemy on sight.

2006-07-16 07:17:56 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

The American Military, by law, can't be used as law enforcement in the US. Regular military that is.

2006-07-16 07:18:38 · answer #7 · answered by Edward F 4 · 0 0

I believe your right,we spend enough time and money doing things in other counties. I was so impressed when they finally put men on the Mexican boarder, it was like wow what a break through lol.

2006-07-16 07:19:24 · answer #8 · answered by darlene793 3 · 0 0

Violation of federal law/constitution to deploy federal troops within border except for defense of homeland.

2006-07-16 07:19:12 · answer #9 · answered by xtowgrunt 6 · 0 0

Let me see, look at how well the military polices in Iraq, you want them in the US. ( maybe along the border in the desert but on our city streets)

2006-07-16 11:36:46 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers