English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

18 answers

Science don't have all the answers. Can science prove that there is no God?

2006-07-16 04:09:36 · answer #1 · answered by A K 5 · 1 2

The world cannot prove that He exists or does not exist. Science has theories that can be proven by man.

Let us understand something, Jesus stated (paraphrasing), "Do not place new wine into old wineskins" Why is this? Well the old wineskins cannot hold the new wine, the will burst under the pressure. This leads me into my next thought, God cannot be explained, He cannot be placed in a box, because He is greater than our own thoughts and reasoning. We honestly do not know anything of God and what He can do with us and through us. It is impossible to fully understand something we are constantly trying to prove scientifically. How do you explain how things happen? How do doctors explain a full remission of cancer in a persons body? How can one explain why a woman is one way and a man is another? How can society explain why a man wants to be outside in the wilderness? Can society explain why a woman is drawn to a real man? Does society know exactly what a real man is? None of the psychologists or psychoanalysts have the answer to those questions.

Lastly, you nor anyone else can explain God. There is no scientific explanation about who is God and what He can do. God is God and He does things that He will do now and forever.

The Bible Proves He Exists. Your Soul Knows He Exists. The sin within every man is terrified of God and will run at the sight of Him and His great power.

2006-07-16 11:19:22 · answer #2 · answered by waeyeaw 3 · 0 0

There's tricky logical proof, goes something like this:

If you believe that the Universe is infinite rather than being created by a Supreme Being, then you must also believe that in an infinite amount of space and time, every possible thing must have taken place somewhere in all that infinity.

Therefore, it's logical to assume that in one part of the Universe, it's a fact that God does exist and that He did create the Universe.

Now that only has to be true ONCE, SOMEWHERE.... And of course, when it does happen, it must become true for the Universe everywhere.

The fallacy of the argument is that the same also goes for Allah and Buddha and the Marshmallow Man of Creation...

2006-07-16 11:15:57 · answer #3 · answered by teddlesRuss 2 · 0 0

I can only give my own evidence on this from scientific fact i have gathered .. this does not prove the existence of god however it does prove the existence of spirit and of higher spirit who teach that there is a "god energy "
now i have to presume that if spirit is pr oven and spirit teachings are proven then this to me is better evidence of a " god " than anything written by man or handed down from generation to generation

2006-07-16 11:21:16 · answer #4 · answered by Peace 7 · 0 0

Frankly, there is nothing I would like better than to have a satisfactory answer for you. I have asked the same question of many many religious people and I have never received an answer that I could accept.

If anyone can give me an acceptable answer for this question I will join them and dedicate every ounce of the effort I have remaining to the worship of their God. Until that happens though, I will remain an Atheist. An Atheist with an open mind, but an Atheist non the less.

I intend to put your question on my watch list and hope for something I can get a grip on. Thank you for asking, it might actually help me as well.

2006-07-16 11:56:20 · answer #5 · answered by gimpalomg 7 · 0 0

None whatsoever. Science investigates the way the real world actually is through verifiable experiment. Religion on the other hand is just belief based on nothing more than human imagination and the wish that there is something beyond this world regardless of overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Religion is the triumph of hope over reason.

2006-07-16 11:18:12 · answer #6 · answered by bonzo the tap dancing chimp 7 · 1 0

Five days after it began, the new conflict in the Middle East has intensified as Hezbollah and Israel struck deeper into each other's territory and claimed more innocent lives.
At least 30 civilians were killed during the latest wave of violence, including a group fleeing Lebanon.
More deaths came as Israeli conducted its first stikes on the centre of Beirut, turning Hezbollah's headquarters into rubble
For scared and frustrated locals, Lebanon's highways have been turned into a tangle of destruction and few petrol stations still operate. Few routes of escape exist.
A convoy of families trying to cross Lebanon's southern border came under attack from an Israeli helicopter near Marwaheen.

Eighteen people, nine of them children, were burnt alive.


this is what religion does

2006-07-16 11:09:26 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

God says he is proven in the heavens and the earth. So there is your scientific fact. In Job, God asks who told the oceans where to stop, who told the stars to shine, who told the birds to fly, etc?

God made it very clear that mankind cannot possibly prove anything.

2006-07-16 11:10:57 · answer #8 · answered by moondrop000 5 · 0 0

Yes whole science is proveing that God is real.... How the universe created..... from Big Bang and from where thsi huge aamount of mountain came from was it was from the beginning of the universese?.....
This is the proof ......
Science is the fact whcih is day by day going towards the Allah.....

2006-07-16 11:18:45 · answer #9 · answered by atif s 2 · 0 0

The Bible says that the creation testifies to the existence of God. Here is a scientific discussion of how that is true.

____________


DNA Double Helix: A Recent Discovery of Enormous Complexity
The DNA Double Helix is one of the greatest scientific discoveries of all time. First described by James Watson and Francis Crick in 1953, DNA is the famous molecule of genetics that establishes each organism's physical characteristics. It wasn't until mid-2001, that the Human Genome Project and Celera Genomics jointly presented the true nature and complexity of the digital code inherent in DNA. We now understand that each human DNA molecule is comprised of chemical bases arranged in approximately 3 billion precise sequences. Even the DNA molecule for the single-celled bacterium, E. coli, contains enough information to fill all the books in any of the world's largest libraries.

DNA Double Helix: The "Basics"
DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) is a double-stranded molecule that is twisted into a helix like a spiral staircase. Each strand is comprised of a sugar-phosphate backbone and numerous base chemicals attached in pairs. The four bases that make up the stairs in the spiraling staircase are adenine (A), thymine (T), cytosine (C) and guanine (G). These stairs act as the "letters" in the genetic alphabet, combining into complex sequences to form the words, sentences and paragraphs that act as instructions to guide the formation and functioning of the host cell. Maybe even more appropriately, the A, T, C and G in the genetic code of the DNA molecule can be compared to the "0" and "1" in the binary code of computer software. Like software to a computer, the DNA code is a genetic language that communicates information to the organic cell.

The DNA code, like a floppy disk of binary code, is quite simple in its basic paired structure. However, it's the sequencing and functioning of that code that's enormously complex. Through recent technologies like x-ray crystallography, we now know that the cell is not a "blob of protoplasm", but rather a microscopic marvel that is more complex than the space shuttle. The cell is very complicated, using vast numbers of phenomenally precise DNA instructions to control its every function.

Although DNA code is remarkably complex, it's the information translation system connected to that code that really baffles science. Like any language, letters and words mean nothing outside the language convention used to give those letters and words meaning. This is modern information theory at its core. A simple binary example of information theory is the "Midnight Ride of Paul Revere." In that famous story, Mr. Revere asks a friend to put one light in the window of the North Church if the British came by land, and two lights if they came by sea. Without a shared language convention between Paul Revere and his friend, that simple communication effort would mean nothing. Well, take that simple example and multiply by a factor containing many zeros.

We now know that the DNA molecule is an intricate message system. To claim that DNA arose by random material forces is to say that information can arise by random material forces. Many scientists argue that the chemical building blocks of the DNA molecule can be explained by natural evolutionary processes. However, they must realize that the material base of a message is completely independent of the information transmitted. Thus, the chemical building blocks have nothing to do with the origin of the complex message. As a simple illustration, the information content of the clause "nature was designed" has nothing to do with the writing material used, whether ink, paint, chalk or crayon. In fact, the clause can be written in binary code, Morse code or smoke signals, but the message remains the same, independent of the medium. There is obviously no relationship between the information and the material base used to transmit it. Some current theories argue that self-organizing properties within the base chemicals themselves created the information in the first DNA molecule. Others argue that external self-organizing forces created the first DNA molecule. However, all of these theories must hold to the illogical conclusion that the material used to transmit the information also produced the information itself. Contrary to the current theories of evolutionary scientists, the information contained within the genetic code must be entirely independent of the chemical makeup of the DNA molecule.

DNA Double Helix: Its Existence Alone Defeats any Theory of Evolution
The scientific reality of the DNA double helix can single-handedly defeat any theory that assumes life arose from non-life through materialistic forces. Evolution theory has convinced many people that the design in our world is merely "apparent" -- just the result of random, natural processes. However, with the discovery, mapping and sequencing of the DNA molecule, we now understand that organic life is based on vastly complex information code, and such information cannot be created or interpreted without a Master Designer at the cosmic keyboard.

2006-07-16 11:26:08 · answer #10 · answered by Martin S 7 · 0 0

Absolutely.....evolution asks you to "accept" that a creature can WILL itself to adapt...Like, Gee, if I could grow a sticky bone out of the top of my head before I die, I could catch more food and be superior to my species, until the others "catch" on, then I'll have to try something else

2006-07-16 11:14:06 · answer #11 · answered by rochelle_hall2000 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers