If the existance of a God could be proven by science beyond any doubt, we would need no faith...no religion.?

Question

True, False, comments?????

Answer 1

false... we would still have to have faith or there would be no benefit of having a God. no matter if he is proven true or not... to still have Him as our God we must have faith that He will bless us and deliver us from our sins

Answer 2

One of these days, read Hebrews 11.
Anyway, breaking your question down in parts, science will never be able to prove His existance without some form of doubt going with it. Unbelievers will always find reason to doubt.
Even after the Jews saw the waters part, some lost faith in God. Yes, there will always be faith in God and the one true christian religion will always be here.

Answer 3

False,
Something that is not true can not be provren true
If people would understand that it's all a lie, then they would prove it was created by king and priest, they would still need faith in themselves, like they have now but would rather give the credit to an un- existing god

Answer 4

we wouldn't need blind faith, but we would still have a choice.
i would say we even have more of a choice since an informed choice is better then a shot in the dark.
for instance say you were on a game show and you got to choose door number one or door number two. is that really a choice if you don't know whats behind the doors?
now say you knew that door number one had a pony and door number two had a chocolate cake, now you can actually choose what you will get.
if God would just tell us which religion is the right one then we actually would have a choice.

Answer 5

. It must be made very clear that this laboratory is one of the most prestigious in Europe. It is the Genetics Forensic Laboratory of the University of Bologna, equipped with the most modern sophisticated equipment with a team of researchers, doctors and biologists University Professors. This laboratory specializes in everything related to DNA. It works with Secret Services and Police of many nations and is in contact with other similar laboratories of other countries………………………………………………………….


This laboratory has Scientific Authority, therefore a verdict released by this laboratory is of indisputable [unquestionable] value. ………………………………………………………… ………………………………
After carrying out all the tests, the laboratory researchers sent Padre Pietro an official document stating, in resume, "the blood is human blood, of group AB, male, and was found to be identical in the two samples tested, the blood from the tears from the Icon of the Virgin and the blood that appeared of the Face of Jesus are the same." But there is more, the document continues from its evaluations to something that seems really incredible: "the configuration of the genetic features found in the Y chromosome does not correspond to any of the configurations present in the world wide data bank where the data of 22,000 male subjects from 187 different populations is kept."

And further on we read: "This blood is so rare that it must be considered as almost unique. By calculation, the statistical probability of finding, in the course of millennia, a typology of the same blood type, is almost nil, the mathematical probability of this happening is in the order of 1 in 200 billion possible cases." [In other words 1 on 200,000,000,000(www.jnsr.be/)

Answer 6

It can't be -- everything dualistic (the universe, us, science, mind, etc.) can not explain or prove god because, by its very nature, all dualism is NOT god -- the concept of an individual self and others is what keeps the experience of god away. The idea of a self proving god's existence is, again, establishing the self as real. The idea of a self looking at a proof of god's existence is, again, making the self real. The only way to 'prove' god's existence is to transcend the self (dualism) and to directly experience god (enlightenment experience). And this has to be done, paradoxically, by individual sentient beings.

Answer 7

Science has proven existence of God! A few example would be nice to consider: the universe is expanding so it has beginning, many scientists now believe in intelligent design/ creation, rather than evolution, etc.

It's just people are so blinded by their hatred towards God that they reject all proofs.

Since God do exist; and he is law giver, it would be wise for us to worship him in a way that he has mandated us. He is looking for worshippers who worship him in truth and in spirit. ( John 4:24) And, contrary to popular beliefs, true faith is not blind. It is based on true knowledge and proof. Read chapter 11 of Hebrews. That chapter enumerates persons who based their faith in true knowledge, they had proofs.

Answer 8

In order to live a moral life, most weak-minded, weak-willed folks still would need their 'God' to be a spiteful, vengeful, cruel god who threatens vicious punishment - you know, like the one which primitive men invented in the bible. If science proved the existence of the true God (who is non-judgmental), half the world would go totally crazy, committing all sorts of atrocities. I.e., we need Christianity, Judaism and the Muslim faith to keep those people in check.

Answer 9

False: we would still need faith in science to believe that the proof it provided was correct. It would depend, too, on the nature of the proof itself. Since the subject of god and his existence can be incredibly ambiguous, it's nearly impossible to think of things that could be presented as rock-solid evidence.

Answer 10

I think that if this were the case then religion would be replaced by a higher form of worship and acknowledgement.
Wouldnt that open up a huge door and allow us to evolve in the highest way possible?