English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-07-16 01:23:23 · 15 answers · asked by Sonny M 3 in Politics & Government Military

Starting from the war on the middle east after 9/11

2006-07-16 01:32:25 · update #1

adrian_hill2001 There's something called a typo, it's 5 32 AM, what do you expect.

2006-07-16 01:33:48 · update #2

adrian_hill2001 There's something called a typo, its 5 33 AM what do you expect.

2006-07-16 01:34:53 · update #3

15 answers

v. nicely put.
i think everyone come to this world with a purpose, so if this retarded guy gets to become the president, then obviously he needs to fulfil his task....lol even if it might be the WWIII

2006-07-16 01:28:14 · answer #1 · answered by really_confused 2 · 0 3

No..Bush isn't waging WWIII...the international is. Do you heavily have faith that Bush could desire to deal with that on his very own? Bush did no longer initiate the non secular conflict between Sunni's and Shiites. Bush did no longer initiate the conflict between Jews and Islam, so on etc. Do you think of he has lived perpetually and is the devil incarnate? of direction no longer. he's completely a newborn-kisser. i do no longer condone various issues he stands for yet he's no longer a Hitler, Mussolini, or Stalin. neither is he a North Korean nutcase that needs to shoot off nuke weapons on the international. I had a nephew in Iraq and he observed firsthand that we necessary to be there. It makes me indignant that a number of you everyone seems to be so slender minded which you won't be able to be sure out of your man or woman little cacoon. examine up on issues and develop your scope..PLEASE.

2016-11-02 03:56:08 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Ironic, Bush beat Kerry on a platform of national defense... Even more ironic, dolt's like yourself believe that Iran, Syria and all the militant islamist in the world wouldn't start WW III if a Democrat were in the White House...

2006-07-16 01:47:49 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I don't. The history of this is a cycle. Israel attacks the Palestinians, the Palestinians promise to stop their acts of terrorism, the Palestinians then break their promise. Repeat.

Before you start calling other people 'retarded' maybe you should make sure that you have at least some understanding of what is going on.

2006-07-16 04:56:09 · answer #4 · answered by MikeGolf 7 · 0 0

WOW ,
One Man Can start a world war ,
Maybe we Can get the President to send 747's to Iran
and crash them into Buildings

2006-07-16 01:28:33 · answer #5 · answered by wvault64 1 · 0 0

I agree with Homer, it may be starting but if it
is Bush didnt start it for sure. Only someone who
lives in a cave would not know that this crap
has been brewing for quite sometime.

2006-07-16 01:44:11 · answer #6 · answered by roman_surf_goddess 2 · 0 0

How many of you think George W. actually gives a rats *** what you think?This is about conquering the world for oil and profit.

2006-07-16 03:00:22 · answer #7 · answered by theforce51 3 · 0 0

We were attacked on 9/11, and a military response was needed and just. Israel has been attacked, and their military response is needed and just.

A country can't sit by and let enemies attack it.

2006-07-16 01:37:01 · answer #8 · answered by FCabanski 5 · 0 0

Is your president the leader of Iran? I know my US president didn't start this.

2006-07-16 01:54:30 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think people like you should learn to spell simple words like "retarded" before asking a question about someones mental state.

2006-07-16 01:28:11 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers