2006-07-15 17:09:52 · 16 answers · asked by ryle 2 in Food & Drink ➔ Other - Food & Drink
Why pick, both can be involved with each other.
2006-07-15 17:13:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, that would first depend on who I was having sex with and how good the sex would be! But if its DYNOMITE sex, then ahh sex over chocolate. But, if the sex is quicker than eating a piece of hersheys Kiss, than give me the chocolate!!!
Even better, DYNOMITE sex with DYNOMITE Chocolate being eaten off each other. Now that would be HOT!!!! And totally up for it!
2006-07-15 17:15:52 · answer #2 · answered by Mac 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
sex lasts a lifetime and chocolate only is there for minutes
2006-07-15 17:15:35 · answer #3 · answered by roeman 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
chocolate
2006-07-15 17:18:16 · answer #4 · answered by Mopar Muscle Gal 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Chocolate, because there's no annoying possessiveness.
2006-07-15 17:14:45 · answer #5 · answered by KylieElenstar 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why choose? Pour chocolate on her, lick it off, and then have sex.
2006-07-15 17:19:16 · answer #6 · answered by ManOfTheHour 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
sex with chocolate in your mouth
2006-07-15 17:13:54 · answer #7 · answered by thirsty 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why be content with one when you can have both at the same time. Where is your creative instincts?
2006-07-15 17:13:53 · answer #8 · answered by DragonHeart18 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
sex because choclate can make u fat and only is good the second you eat it. sex has no effect on your weight and is good till u org*sm
2006-07-15 17:15:05 · answer #9 · answered by evilhomer12345 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both are equally pleasing to me.
2006-07-15 17:23:40 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋