Even Israel feels awkward in Lebanon, but as long as they let Hezbollah infringe in their space, they open themselves up for attacks.
I believe that Mr. Bush will wait for Iran to step out of line. It's pretty obvious to me that Iran is behind this whole incident, here's why. Iran is the financial source for Hezbollah, so we already know of those connecting dots. The UN security council offered a deal to Iran for it to give up its Nuclear ambitions. Iran told the security council that it would have an answer to them by July 12. They never did provide the answer, but it was that date that Hezbollah kidnapped the Israeli soldiers that started this whole mess. That to me, is more than coincidence. That tells me that Iran was not only privy to this plan, but that they helped plan this whole vicious event. These are bad people and it won't sadden me to see them standing in line for their virgins.
2006-07-15 15:15:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by briang731/ bvincent 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
Are you kiddin me? Israel has the best weapons with the latest technology. They are also the best trained warriors on that side of the planet. And if you look at your history, they don't need our troops. As you can see by the news reports, Israel is kicking the sh-t out of Hezbollah. That question was lame and just another attempt to discredit our president. Israel can smoke any of those middle eastern countries and they all know it. The only thing holding them back is us. The U.S. wants peace in the middle east.
2006-07-15 14:48:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by jhrkickin 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Israel can handle Hezbollah. We will not get involved their unless Israel needs us (and I don't think they will). The real question is Iran. It's pretty clear that Iran is pulling the strings on Hezbollah to divert attention from their nuclear intentions. This will all eventually lead to Tehran and that's where we will get involved. And need to get involved . The Middle East (and the rest of the world) will not be safe until Hezbollah, Hamas, Syria and Iran are wiped off the face of the earth. It's time to unleash hell and turn most of the Middle East into a parking lot.
2006-07-15 14:44:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by Nuke Lefties 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
in the starting up, it is no longer our warfare, we went there because of terrorists activities, were very nearly executed. we've more desirable issues, oil, and Nuclear warfare over the North and South Korea border. Al Qaeda and the taliban, are very nearly depleted, we are education Iraq infantrymen to take over there own usa. the most important probability in Iraq and Iran excellent this second's vehicle bombings, IED etc. we've a probability of Nuclear attack excellent this second, we are loosing further and extra infantrymen by IEDS then we are of terrorist attacks. they prefer to carry close there usa and take it over themselfs. And have self belief me, yet another 9/11 merely to placed extra infantrymen contained in the conflict field to die from IED attacks? No. and characteristic you theory about the terrorist signals on Fox information? we've administration over terrorrist attacks contained in the U. S. now. Cant actually have a Zippo at an airport anymore. All shoes are to be bumped off. do not say that. Be extra interested in what China and North Korea are going to do, no longer yet another countries issues, they're going to might want to do something about it. we gained't protect there own usa. it is no longer our land. provide US a spoil, the elections are even extra as regards to.
2016-11-06 10:33:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by tahir 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think we need to pull our troops out of Iraq!!! Let them fend for themselves!!! There will always be WAR over there!! There is no sense in all the "killings" of our troops!!! Our damn president is TRYING to take care of everyone else but our own! I DID NOT VOTE FOR BUSH and i cant wait till hes out of office!!!
While he`s in office he will be stupid enuf to send our troops anywhere!!! I say pull out and leave the psychos alone!!!
2006-07-15 14:40:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by brock 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I doubt it. But I hope he sends em into Iran or Syria, who are the cause of the problems in Lebanon. You should join up tomorrow. Maybe you would grow out of the liberalist elite viewpoint you have. :P
2006-07-15 14:31:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by InnerCircle 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well I was wrong thinking he wasn’t foolish enough to send troops to Iraq, so…
2006-07-15 18:54:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by Rockvillerich 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nope
We don't have the capacity for that. Besides, we want this issue to be resolved as peacefully as possible. Believe it or not, the US wants Israel and Lebanon to avoid war.
2006-07-15 14:31:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by Cherry 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Israel doesn't need any of our troops to kick the **** out of Arab scum... they have been doing it since 1948, I think they can handle the Arabs without our bozos getting in the way...
ڇﮗﮱټڮ
2006-07-15 14:52:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
OH yeah, of course he will, because he's a war monger, and all the companys that make guns and bombs, and missiles will make a fortune from it.
2006-07-15 21:46:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋