2006-07-15 03:53:33 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Education & Reference ➔ Other - Education
in the Bible it says the ark lays on mount arrarot , is it the same a arrat?
2006-07-15 04:52:32 · update #1
I could use it ...Im asking the question here
2006-07-15 04:53:07 · update #2
ok use the bible-bible thumpers-J/k I have love for ya'll just prove your case.
2006-07-15 04:55:13 · update #3
water came up from the ground-underground springs and rivers
that is why he built the ark and it didn't fill with water.
there is a species of lizard that scientists have proven to be all female but procreate with each other some how. they can't explain it. Think about it, can you tell the sex of a lizard?
Animals were in separate cages much like a zoo. Realistically, you couldn't have animal running around. I'm sure they brought extra feeder animals for the carnivores.
There have been discoveries of the arks under belly imprints in Turkish mountains.
With diseases being low or nonexistent, his two sons and their wives could procreate and their children could populate the earth.
2006-07-15 04:00:53 · answer #1 · answered by ♣ 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Based on the fossil record, I'd say fact. If there were ever a global flood we'd find billions of death things burried in rock layers as if they were laid down by water. And, what do you get if you look at fossils around the world?... Billions of dead things burried in rock layers as if they were laid down by water! Furthermore, most cultures have some sort of "great flood" story in their heritage. And lastly, the Ark is believed ot have been found on the summit of Mount Ararat (I think in Turkey), but the government of the country will not allow an expedition to confirm the find. If you study the facts, fossils, and water formations aound the world, it all adds up to Noah's Ark and a Global Flood!
2006-07-15 10:59:28 · answer #2 · answered by snodrift777 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Fact! Ofcourse its how you view the world around you or more importantly how you are indoctrinated to view everything around you.
You see the media only tells you what it wants and leaves out some of the evidence. You can look at a cube from 1 angle to make it a square. You can look at it from other angles and see it is a cube. Its how you look at it what makes the difference.
So, if there was a flood we would expect layers of rock formed and bent sometimes, fossils of dead things layed down by mud, canyons and valleys.
Extrodinarilly, we do find exactly that. Yet many people want to believe in millions of years of evolution. Check out my book if you want answers 'The Hidden Secrets of the Ancient Scrolls' it is coming out soon next month I think.
Regards
Paul
2006-07-15 11:00:13 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Archaeological evidence has substantiated the fact of Noah's Ark.
It was spotted several times in World War Two by English pilots.
There have been several expeditions to the site which is in Turkey, I believe.
2006-07-15 11:00:36 · answer #4 · answered by drg5609 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have a hard time believing that lions and zebras could remain on the same ark for 40 days and 40 nights without the zebras becoming a snack.
2006-07-15 10:59:16 · answer #5 · answered by clion71 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Fiction.
2006-07-15 10:58:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
id say fact, but you cant really use anydetails without mentioning the bible.
2006-07-15 11:11:38 · answer #7 · answered by . 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Fact you don't see fat animals that didn't make it to the boat.
2006-07-15 10:59:33 · answer #8 · answered by animalmother 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋