http://www.visionsofjesuschrist.com/weeping459.htm
2006-07-15 02:37:51 · 11 answers · asked by idspudnik 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Who knows? I surely don't.
2006-07-15 02:43:48 · answer #1 · answered by kibbie01 4 · 4⤊ 3⤋
The only authentic "photograph" that I am aware of is the photograph of Jesus through the Shroud of Turin.
A photo was taken of the Shroud and the picture turned out as a photographic negative. When put through an image scanner, the negative produced a 3-D image.
Look up Shroud of Turin on the internet; I'm sure you'll find the photo of which I speak.
Rebecca
2006-07-15 09:53:25 · answer #2 · answered by Rebecca 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I can only repeat what Jesus Himself said: In the Last Days, you will hear rumors: Look! He is there! But it will not be I. [Loose translation-- I don't have the scripture in front of me.] Besides, I've seen that pic before. It's based on the Shroud of Turin, which may or may not be the real thing.
2006-07-15 09:47:59 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It says in the Holy Bible (Mathew) that Jesus was not of comely appearance but very plain and would inspire lust in nobody...but this guy is a true beauty and looks fashionably like the popular image everyone had of Christ late 19th & early 20th Century. I have a sneaking suspicion it might be a fake don't you.
2006-07-15 09:54:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hmmm..let's put on our thinking cap. I'm gonna have to go ahead and say no, since back then there were no cameras hence there could be no "photograps". Perhaps back then someone could could have drawn a sketch or painting. But photograph.. ummmno.
2006-07-15 09:42:46 · answer #5 · answered by staygold 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't see why is can't be, but I think it is prudent to err on the side of skepticism until the Church gives her blessing to a series of apparitions. Also, Archbishop Milingo is a very controversial leader; unorthodox, and not always willing to submit to his superiors. Anything connected with him is suspect if you ask me. And, you did ask.
2006-07-15 09:50:26 · answer #6 · answered by infinity 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They didn't have cameras back in Jesus' time. That's a bogus photograph
2006-07-15 09:42:51 · answer #7 · answered by FootballFan1012 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Too bad it's in black and white. People don't really know the truth, that Jesus had blue hair. It doesn't show up in this picture.
2006-07-15 09:46:55 · answer #8 · answered by spike_is_my_evil_vampire 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
there were no camera's way back then, so how could there ever be a photo of Him
2006-07-15 09:54:58 · answer #9 · answered by keith B 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i am sure,this is not photo
2006-07-15 09:42:27 · answer #10 · answered by nice guy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋