No.
In order to provide the high mach numbers that modern aircraft travel at (.82.85 mach) and carry a profitable load, there isn't alot of room to change the modern configuration of most jets. (Thats the reason that most pax airliners look remarkably alike these days)
To design a seagoing aircraft capable of high mach cruise and acceptable handling on the ocean with a decent payload ....is just too many comprimises.
Another consideration is that touch down speeds of modern airliners are around 120-160kts. This would waaayyy too high to consider a water landing. So you would have to design the aircraft with the ability to fly MUCH slower and again..too much of a comprimise.
Not to mention salt water corrosion, water ingestion into the engines, difficulty in servicing....
Nope not gonna happen
You might goggle 'Beriev' to see a somewhat successful water borne large jet..but for a very specific application
2006-07-14 17:56:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by helipilot212 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes!
I hate to break the bubble of some people, but plans are in fact being floated (pun) for such a plane. The market would be a super jumbo plane. Bigger than the 747 or A 380. Land aircraft are limited by current facilities. Length of runway, gates, parking areas, weight are factors seaplanes can bypass. 3/4 of the world is water. so the ability to say land on the Hudson river in Midtown NyC and other places make for a great transport option. A seaplane could be wider than current planes like the 747. You could build real walking room, a casino, a bar or club, sleeping bunks,etc. Mass transport in comfort. And for those wondering about speed? The Navy's Martin PM-6 Seamaster could do mach .9 in 1956 on the deck and out fly the B-52. The Russian company Beriev have bee a leader in Seaplanes for years & has some large types in place today!
2006-07-15 13:37:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by lana_sands 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Sadly seaplanes have (for the most part) gone the way of the Dodo.
They were popular at a time when engine failures were a common thing and since it would be almost "normal" for the plane to make and unscheduled landing, Flying Boats were the best option for trans-Atlantic and trans-Pacific routes were most of the flight was over water.
Maintenance and operating costs of seaplanes (think of the corrosion) make it quite unlikely that they will ever make a comeback on major airline's fleets.
2006-07-14 18:38:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by frankclau 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Think of the limitations. Airports that service these planes would have to be on a coast or near a major body of water. I don't think the major airlines, who would be the customers for these aircraft, would want to deal with the limitations imposed by having to be near large bodies of water.
2006-07-14 17:47:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by bazzmc 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not feasible. That's why they went out to start with. With the amount of passenger traffic today, a plane needs constant inspection and maintenece. That would be very costly to do if the plane was floating on water.
2006-07-14 17:59:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by crazytrain_23_78 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, i think that it is possible but i think it will be very hard to determine(company wise and economically) if they should stay in the normal air or branch off into the air/water industry.
Great idea for cost to cost tavel because if you hit hard flying conditions you can just land.
2006-07-14 17:51:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by DJ 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
it is a possibilty but probly not the only reason they had the float planes were becaus they a lack of runways
2006-07-15 17:31:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
maybe anything could happen that doesn't mean a yes or no
2006-07-14 17:39:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by Marissa S 2
·
0⤊
1⤋