2006-07-14 13:30:24 · 25 answers · asked by jallygood 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Agnostic is incorrect, I used to think that that was the propper word.
2006-07-14 13:33:14 · update #1
I'm looking for a single word describing my question. I used to think it was agnostic, silly me.
2006-07-14 14:11:58 · update #2
Confused as h.e.l.l
2006-07-14 13:33:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The Epistemology of Religion
The evidence can allow one to embrace such truths that are foundational and disregard those that lack either explanation or logic. One who would follow such would be an
EPISTERMOLOGIST
Contemporary epistemology of religion may conveniently be treated as a debate over whether evidentialism applies to the belief-component of religious faith, or whether we should instead adopt a more permissive epistemology. Here by ‘evidentialism’ I mean the initially plausible position that a belief is justified only if "it is proportioned to the evidence". Evidentialism implies that it is not justified to have a full religious belief unless there is conclusive evidence for it. It follows that if the known arguments for there being a God, including any arguments from religious experience, are at best probable ones, no one would be justified in having full belief that there is a God. And the same holds for other religious beliefs, such as the Christian belief that Jesus was God incarnate. Likewise, it would not be justified to believe even with less than full confidence if there is not a balance of evidence for belief.
2006-07-14 13:42:16 · answer #2 · answered by DrLapaz 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i'd call that human being non secular particularly than non secular. I have self belief you may have a company count number on a God, more desirable power, author of the Universe with out following a particular faith. I do, in any case.
2016-11-06 09:35:00 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hypocrite
2006-07-14 13:31:56 · answer #4 · answered by Angry C 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Me...someone who has the common sense to realize that God is not about following every man made rule of any particular organized religion. I have picked a church and a religion that is the closest to my beliefs, but it has taken me years to find it.
2006-07-14 13:34:50 · answer #5 · answered by butrcupps 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"Typical"? :)
How about "unfortunate" or "lost"?
James 2:10 For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all.
Matthew 7:21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.
2006-07-14 13:34:43 · answer #6 · answered by flyersbiblepreacher 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Reasonable.
2006-07-14 13:33:11 · answer #7 · answered by ThatGuy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If the person is Christian they are called cafeteria Christians because they only pick and choose what they like. I think it can be applied to other religions as well.
2006-07-14 13:53:07 · answer #8 · answered by pinacoladasundae 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Christian.
Sad but true. If everyone believed in the entire Bible, my guess is that there would be a lot less religions. But then, I'm a Christian.
2006-07-14 13:34:57 · answer #9 · answered by diesel_pusher2 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Eclectic? Quasi religious?
2006-07-14 13:34:43 · answer #10 · answered by Ahab 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Smorgasboard.
2006-07-14 13:32:38 · answer #11 · answered by Tim 47 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋