English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-07-14 13:07:56 · 18 answers · asked by rj_m49 1 in Environment

18 answers

Standard bulds. It has been proven.

2006-07-14 13:09:38 · answer #1 · answered by cows4me79 4 · 1 0

Standard Bulbs.

2006-07-14 13:11:25 · answer #2 · answered by jm.deblois 2 · 0 0

the standard bulb uses more energy. And the florescent lasts a whole lot longer the the standard ones do, but are more expensive to buy.

2006-07-14 13:12:25 · answer #3 · answered by koohlman 2 · 0 0

Incandescent bulbs, absolutely. This is kinda tricky. The incandescent bulb that (for example) uses 100 Watts, that power is converted to lumens (or brightness...how much light it puts out). The flourescent tube putting out the same amount of light will use significantly less power. The flourescent light is much more efficient at converting electricity into light.

While you're at it, ask the question correctly. It's not which uses most "electricity" but which uses the most power. The standard unit of power is a Watt.

2006-07-14 13:16:35 · answer #4 · answered by Albannach 6 · 0 0

Depends on the wattage. Most florescent bulbs use less wattage than incandescent (standard) bulbs. Florescent bulbs contain mercury and contaminate if broken.

2006-07-14 13:13:08 · answer #5 · answered by Bill 6 · 0 0

Nope, whoever advised you that had no thought what they have been speaking approximately. I confirmed CFLs because of the fact the state potential megastar rep for a pair of years, and that i used watt meters to illustrate how lots potential they and commonplace incadescent bulbs used. there became no "spike" whilst the CFLs have been grew to become on, those I used have been 13 watts and that's what the watt meter confirmed became getting used--in evaluation to the a hundred watts for the commonplace bulb I had in my exhibit. additionally the important fabricated from a commonplace incadescent bulb is warmth-- extra potential is going to offer warmth than seen easy so throughout the summer time your cooling invoice additionally will flow down some. What he could be touching on is the previous previous thought that had some validity 40 years or extra in the past, whilst the ballasts in flourescent bulb furniture did draw somewhat extra potential upon initiate up. yet that doesn't take place, the recent CFLs have good state ballasts included into the bulb and don't surge.

2016-12-14 08:17:34 · answer #6 · answered by Erika 3 · 0 0

standard bulbs. Which is why you should use florescent bulbs. You save dough and the environment because you save electricity.

2006-07-14 13:11:40 · answer #7 · answered by jj 3 · 0 0

A Watt is a Watt! A 32W fluorescent consumes the same amount of power as a 32W incandescent bulb. The difference is that for the same power used the fluorescent will produce alot more light.

2006-07-14 13:15:12 · answer #8 · answered by NubbY 4 · 0 0

"Incandescent light bulbs give off most of their energy in the form of heat-carrying infrared light photons -- only about 10 percent of the light produced is in the visible spectrum. This wastes a lot of electricity. Cool light sources, such as fluorescent lamps and LEDs, don't waste a lot of energy generating heat -- they give off mostly visible light. For this reason, they are slowly edging out the old reliable light bulb."

2006-07-14 13:11:26 · answer #9 · answered by ekaty84 5 · 0 0

an incandescent bulb consumes more electricity than fluorescent because incandescent buld need's a direct flow of current to light up it's filament ,while fluorescent uses air that superman hated (kyptonite) inside the tube to glow and need only few current.

2006-07-14 13:18:37 · answer #10 · answered by Romel c 2 · 0 0

That would depend on the wattage you are using. That is a proven fact. Fluorescent has the ability to make more lumens at a lower wattage. So the more electricity is used by which ever one you were using with a higher wattage factor.

2006-07-14 13:13:37 · answer #11 · answered by shortsremover 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers