How do you feel about chemical weapons, or weapons of mass destruction?

Question

How do you feel about countries having chemical weapons?

Do you feel we should just abolish them all togther or what?

Give me some feedback!

Answer 1

There's nothing like the smell of napalm in the morning, and besides, it's a damn good anti personnel weapon. A little willie peter on their azz and they won't be doing much fighting in the near future.

Poisonous gases , on the other hand are unhumane, as are many other chemical weapons.

Answer 2

Abolishing weapons of mass destruction has always been
a debate since WW2. Its just that if one country has them they all
follow the example. For example the U.S.A posesses such
weopens and we cannot diss North Korea and Iran unless
the U.S.A destroys their weapons of mass destruction. Personally I'd say its okay as long as the U.S has them
its okay if every country does. I mean just because the
U.S.A is a super power does not mean they have the right to
posses such weapons when other countries can't. Its like racism if you know what I mean. But so far these are the countries
with nuclier weapons as you feed back ( excluding Iran which
has not got it......yet.

U.S.A
Russia
China
India
Pakistan
North Korea
France
Japan ( This country definetly deserves the right)!!

Answer 3

Chemical weapons.. are particularly nasty things.. anything that melts your skin out from under your coat makes me think twice? Unfortunately we have the largest stockpiles of all WMD's globaly that is.. in fact we spend more money making weapons than the three closest competitors , Russia, China and Japan.. http://www.cdi.org/issues/wme/spendersFY03.html
so yes I wish that all the nations would stop making such things but until we do they aint gonna... Most people will say the cold war ended when the USSR folded.. Not true and I will use that link as p[roof !!! we are just competing with everyone now instead of Russia alone.
Over compensation usually indicates feelings of inadequacy...
does our country have a small penis?

Answer 4

Mustard Gas (Yperite) was first used by the German Army in September 1917. The most lethal of all the poisonous chemicals used during the war, it was almost odourless and took twelve hours to take effect. Yperite was so powerful that only small amounts had to be added to high explosive shells to be effective. Once in the soil, mustard gas remained active for several weeks.

The skin of victims of mustard gas blistered, the eyes became very sore and they began to vomit. Mustard gas caused internal and external bleeding and attacked the bronchial tubes, stripping off the mucous membrane. This was extremely painful and most soldiers had to be strapped to their beds. It usually took a person four or five weeks to die of mustard gas poisoning. One nurse, Vera Brittain, wrote: "I wish those people who talk about going on with this war whatever it costs could see the soldiers suffering from mustard gas poisoning. Great mustard-coloured blisters, blind eyes, all sticky and stuck together, always fighting for breath, with voices a mere whisper, saying that their throats are closing and they know they will choke."

The same about Mustard Gas.

Answer 5

I agree - abolish them, in fact

the coutries that sold them in the first place like Russia, France and the USA should be forced to buy them back at cost (adjusted for inflation of course)...

Answer 6

Well the United States and Russia both still have over 3,000 Nuclear War Heads each, you can't bet your butt that neither side will ever totally lay down there weapons.

I don't care if foreign nations seek Nuclear capability as long as they don't bomb us.

Answer 7

In the wrong hands, they're deadly, and in the right hands....hell, they're still deadly. Either way, they'll kill you, so I guess it depends on if you're suicidal or not.

Answer 8

I like them as long as they don't go off here in the U.S.

Answer 9

we're gonna blow ourselves up

Answer 10

hope it never happen .