2006-07-14 10:16:27 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Because we're right, and you're wrong.
How's that?
2006-07-14 10:20:02 · answer #1 · answered by ThatGuy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In any war, there is collatoral damage - translated, that means civilians. It's not desirable, but in an urban war, it is inevitable.
If a US soldier went out and killed anyone for no lawful reason, they would be tried and punished. Right now, some soldiers are waiting trial for those types of crimes.
If a government during war callously kills civilians to make a point, to urge support for their position, or to claim retribution for the acts of the other side, they are guilty of war crimes, and should also be punished.
When a terrorist attacks a restaurant or other public place where there are no legitimate military targets, just to make a point or to show that they are able to bomb whereever they please, then they are commiting and atrocity, and should be punished by their own country, and by any opposing force that finds and detains them.
The true method for achieving change in a country is to work through the ballot box, not with guns and bombs. Terrorists want their own way WHEN NO MAJORITY OPINION exists in their favor. They are not liberators, they are bullies. They want things their way, and to hell with anyone else.
Does that clarify it for you?
2006-07-14 10:25:02 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because Americans generally do not kill children (or anyone else) on purpose.
When noncombatants are killed by US soldiers, it is almost always by accident -- or it's because the "insurgents" we're fighting like to use women and children as human shields in the middle of firefights.
Muslim terrorists and "insurgents," meanwhile, make it a point to kill innocent people on purpose.
The tiny few US soldiers who do kill innocent people on purpose are put on trial for it and sent to prison. But the Muslim fanatics who kill people on purpose are celebrated as heroes and martyrs.
Why do you morally equate accidental deaths with deliberate murder?
2006-07-14 10:21:59 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
What do you mean, if an American kill a child he is librator? Who's killing a child? I can see that you are angry about something. Maybe instead of venting your frustrations in broken English on a site where noone is going to take you seriously, you should research this question and try to do something about it.
2006-07-14 10:21:43 · answer #4 · answered by Answer Schmancer 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is about fanatics, not countries, not religions, not any decent form of living. There are fanatical Americans. There are fanatical Muslims. There are fanatical men. There are fanatical woman. There are fanatical leaders. There are fanatical follows. There are fanatical idealists...
This is not about America or Islam. It is about people who live their lives to cuase trouble and harm to others. There is no purpose to it. No explaination.
A fanatic of truth,
Silence
2006-07-14 12:57:40 · answer #5 · answered by enfalas 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If extreme islamo-fascists wouldn't go around trying to kill all non-muslims, then we wouldn't have to ponder this question, would we?
If you don't like violence in the world, then look closely at the Muslims. They start it all, and they perpetuate it all.
2006-07-14 10:21:45 · answer #6 · answered by Farly the Seer 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
supposedly its for the good of man kind! to go in and kill innocent women and children then think Yes Lord we helped them. thoese poor savage people.
2006-07-14 10:21:17 · answer #7 · answered by devilskitten2005 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If a man ask a question like this he is seriously screwed up. why?
2006-07-14 10:28:13 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋