English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It is a totally illogical argument and if they are using that kind of though then why doesn't Mexico give their land back to the MAYA, OLMEC, ZAPOTEC, MIXTEC, TOLTEC, and AZTEC tribes? Hell why don't we give the earth back to the cave men and dinosaurs? So please all of you people who hate the white man explain your selves

2006-07-14 09:33:23 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Immigration

mculasso you're the dumba$$. Your right about one thing though, native americans are the true owners of the land and guess what. We gave them land on which they govern and US laws don't apply so in a sense we did give the land back to the original owners. Mexico was just another product of European conquest and Mexico was a conqueror of the native americans. So it's not Mexico's land chum......p!

2006-07-14 10:16:42 · update #1

19 answers

What are you retarded? Spanish people and native americans colonized the new world hundreds of years before we fought and killed them off. Why do u think the states of California Florida Arizona and New Mexico have spanish names? Thats because it was Mexican/Spanish territory for so long dumb@ss.

2006-07-14 09:41:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Why are they harping on this issue now that immigration has become an issue all we hear now are from only the people in country illegally grasping at straws about the great land deal. They just had a President election didn't see any one in a position of power demanding back any of this land or saying it's ours now tear down everything you built and return our land to us as you found it. Even if the land was their's to this day the country can't even tend to what land it has now and people are leaving in droves is more space and land going to solve what ? Not anything hardly. Birth control is not practiced the country would be in deeper trouble than it is now ! Why they are so hard up they resort to issues they already lost to.. sorry baby can't have it both ways.

2006-07-14 10:15:45 · answer #2 · answered by Zoe 4 · 0 0

nicely first, the U. S. authorities provided to purchase the land. The President of Mexico reported no and the warfare all started, the U. S. received the warfare and wager what, they nevertheless paid for the land. that money should be nicely worth over $70 m in the present day, for below advanced and undeveloped land. So, in case you desire the land decrease back, you ought to easily ought to reimburse the money, by using the undeniable fact that's nicely worth in the present day, plus extra for arising a range of of the land. yet, considering a range of of Mexicans are coming illegally for the money, i'd ought to say that you do not have the $70+ m to go back up with the fee.

2016-10-14 11:28:16 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Those Indians groups have, for the most part, died of disease or have been assimilated into the mixed mestizo population. Ergo, the closest logical heirs are the Mexicans.

As for the land being sold... umm, yeah... Polk provoked a war and occupied Mexico with the clear intention of taking it. The fact that the US paid pennies for the land does not justify the actions undertaken by the United States.

2006-07-14 09:38:14 · answer #4 · answered by Walter 5 · 0 0

I think you've answered your own question. But... they claim that the land was stolen during the Mexican American War, which they regard as having been unjustly instituted by the USA, and then used as an excuse to annex the land. Who knows? But, I believe one thing is absolutely true. Every Mexican that sneaks across the border into the US is casting a vote that the US did the right thing by taking the land.

Gringo.

2006-07-14 09:38:16 · answer #5 · answered by Larry S 1 · 0 0

lol... well im mexican myself and some people do go over board... yeah we use to own this land and we were force to sell it at and injustifiable price, but we sold it. Anyways we cant give back the land to any of those tribes they no longer exist. The only remains is within the mexican people. So technically we are the true heirs of the land.

2006-07-14 09:39:43 · answer #6 · answered by Freddy 2 · 0 0

If we give this land back to Mexico, what makes you think they are going to run it as good as the Americans? There'll be taco shops everywhere. They'd probably try to go across the border to Canada to look for better lives.

2006-07-14 09:47:30 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

it's not about hating white men, and we're not talking about millions of years ago... I'm not Mexican but i still believe that what is being done to them is unjust! The land was originally theirs and it was taking away from them, just like they took it away from American Indians! What's done is done but at least allow them freedom and allow them a life where they can raise their families in peace!

2006-07-14 09:38:29 · answer #8 · answered by coldilocks 3 · 0 0

Actually on the Discovery channel, they said they had recently found skeletons that dated back BEFORE the native Americans even!!! And,GUESS WHAT??? The skeletons were that of a WHITE person!!!!
Shoots to hell,some of these arguments,doesn't it??!!! LOL!!!

2006-07-14 10:20:36 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

They're angry that Mexico lost the struggle for which nation would dominate the continent and are trying to undo Manifest Destiny.

2006-07-14 09:36:38 · answer #10 · answered by Crusader1189 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers