English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories
0

Ok I admit I have no clue on Evolution, but some are saying Ape/Man came from a single cell. Ok if nothing was here, no earth and light, no nothing cause things havent evolved or the bang didnt happen yet as some of you Evolutionist believe.So if nothing was here, how did a bang happen. Something cannot be created out of nothing. And lets say a Ape was evolved from a single cell, well how is that Ape gonna make it if he has to wait millions of years to evolve? Apes don't have that long of a life span. Only God can take nothing and make something out of it.

2006-07-14 07:49:31 · 33 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

33 answers

Theory of the big bang : God spoke the universe into existence . God made man in His image , He is no ape . This is for the non-believers , and I stand with you . God bless you and your family . Praise Him !

2006-07-14 07:56:27 · answer #1 · answered by robinhoodcb 4 · 0 2

> Ok I admit I have no clue on Evolution,

Get a clue. Visit wikipedia.

> So if nothing was here, how did a bang happen

Good question. We don't know about conditions before the Big Bang. In fairness, consider this:

In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and the Word was God.

What happened before the beginning? What happened before there was the Word?

> Something cannot be created out of nothing.

True now. Might not have held true for conditions before the Big Bang.

Did someone create God? If so, where'd HE come from?

> how is that Ape gonna make it if he has to wait millions of years

The ape has children. Some of his children are a little more man-like. The ones who are more manlike have more children than the ones who aren't. Etc.

2006-07-14 08:07:34 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

q.) So if nothing was here, how did a bang happen?

a.) There wasn't "nothing." There was a singularity.

q.) And lets say a Ape was evolved from a single cell, well how is that Ape gonna make it if he has to wait millions of years to evolve? Apes don't have that long of a life span.

a.) Individual animals do not evolve. Their species does. Over the centuries, ape-like animals gave birth to offspring that were slightly more human like. Generations later, you have people.

2006-07-14 07:53:33 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Hun, I'll recommend you to do the following:

First, you need to understand the difference between big bang, abiogenesis and evolution.
- Big bang is a physical cosmology theory
- Abiogenesis refers to the theories about the chemical origin of life
- Evolution is the theory that propose an explanation to the origin of the especies through trait changes in several generations of a specie

It's pretty clear you do not understand evolution, what an ape needs to keep evolving is to spawn and inherit its traits to new members, breeding and dying is required. There are other several factors proposed by the theory.

Big bang theories and abiogenesis theories are even more complex abstracts than evolution, first cover evolution and then move to the others.

Now, to be able to dismiss a theory because you think it's false, the first thing you need to do is to understand it, at least at a basic level. It's not a honest thing to say that some theory is wrong without even knowing what the theory is about, it's better to say that "you don't accept it because you don't know what it is about" than you affirm the theory is false. Once you know it, you'll have enough solid arguments to state your position about it. It's important that you study both sides as well, there are people who base all their knowledge in "answersingenesis" only, you need to see the whole picture before picking a side.

It's important, as well, that you understand what a "theory" is in sciences, since theory, in this context, doesn't mean "a guess", a theory in science is already much more than just a guess. I really wish you look for the answers and Yahoo Answers ain't a good place to do so, there are better sources in the net.

Bye and good luck.

2006-07-14 08:13:43 · answer #4 · answered by Oedipus Schmoedipus 6 · 0 0

ok heres how it goes more or less:
single cells kept reproducing, but with time as they reproduced the new cells were different from their parents. these differences are called mutations. if the mutation helped the new cells then obviously these are the cells that will live longer and better and therefore are most likely to reproduce. after millions of years the mutations that occur are called EVOLUTION. its not that hard to understand really.
o and the big bang:
basically there was this huge explosion and everything was created, not created in the sense that it came from nowhere but in the sense that it had properties it was matter, the dust wasnt just dust anymore. the explosion probably occured because differnent elements got together and didtn like each other.
not to hard either right?
there is evidence for both of these theories if u are willing to look it up. a good site is wikipedia, just type evolution or big bang and you'll get it.

2006-07-14 08:01:08 · answer #5 · answered by locomexican89 3 · 0 0

Your question is so illogical, so @ss backwards, it hurts my head. A single ape doesn't evolve! Individuals do not evolve, populations do!! Furthermore, if you don't know what the hell you are talking about, why are you attacking it?! You don't even have a grasp of the most basic concepts governing evolution. This is something you need to research and read up on, but from a reputed refrence. I don't have the time, nor the patience to explain it. Check the sources below if you are actually curious, and not a closed minded fool.

2006-07-14 08:02:13 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The idea of evolution - whether you believe in it or not - is not that the ape evolved from a single cell. Evolution states that a single celled organism developed into a more complex organism, which developed into an even more developed organism. This pattern repeating over and over again, eventually the animals (including apes) which we know to day evolved.

This evolution involved many, many life cycles. Not a single cell all of a sudden evolving to an ape in one day (or even one lifetime).

2006-07-14 07:56:30 · answer #7 · answered by rachcoli 2 · 0 0

Your mixing up abiogenesis, evolution theory, and the big bang theory. Your not going to understand it all by asking a few simple questions on the internet. It's illogical that you refuse to accept something before you understand it. You don't seem too open minded. Learning this stuff takes a lot more time and effort than it does to accept that "God did it". That's the easy way out. I'm guessing you don't know how a nuclear reactor is built and runs but, you don't assume that God did it. Just because you don't know something doesn't mean the answer is God.

2006-07-14 08:02:38 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

1.Something was always there, it was just extremely compacted, and blew apart
2. "Matter cannot be created nor destroyed" - proves that God can't create something out of nothing.
3. "how is that Ape gonna make it if he has to wait millions of years to evolve? Apes don't have that long of a life span" - most idiotic thing I have heard all day.

2006-07-14 07:54:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Different animals evolve from other animals. Ape's evolution was a very, very, very slow process and had nothing to do with a single individual. By the way, I am a Christian and I accept evolution. Stop taking the Bible so dang literally!

2006-07-14 07:57:42 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Actually, _ex nihilo, nihilo_ (nothing can come out of nothing) has long since been disproven by quantum physics. In fact, any space that is a complete vacuum, containing neither mass nor energy (that is, absolutely nothing) spontaneously pops out particle/antiparticle pairs. So out of nothing, comes something. This has been proven by the Uncertainty Principle, which states that you cannot know both the mass and direction of a particle perfectly accurately - the more you measure one, the less accurate the second reading becomes. This is also true for energy fields - you cannot know both the energy and the rate of change in energy perfectly accurately. So, if a field contains nothing, then you know both perfectly - 0. Therefore (and this has been observed) the field _spontaneously, and out of nothing_ creates particle/antiparticle pairs.

2006-07-14 07:56:55 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers