Do you realize how many comparable sites could be listed for Bigfoot, UFOs, Leprechauns, The Loch Ness Monster, Yeti's, and Mermaids?
2006-07-14 07:55:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by Snark 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
You can't believe everything you read...
But okay, anyway evolution is only an issue when a species has competition from other species. If it's ideally suited to its 'niche' in the ecosystem, random mutation will generally be a disadvantage, and the 'evolved' ones will be the ones that die out. Some insect species apparently haven't evolved for hundreds of thousands of years - because they haven't had 'need' to, so to speak.
2006-07-14 07:43:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by XYZ 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
This isn't proof, and it is not science. This is a paranormal field of study called cryptozoology.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryptozoology
While cryptozoology is interesting, it does not deal in facts until a specimen is found and reported. Factual discoveries in biology must pass the normal muster of peer review, usually by being published in Nature or National Geographic.
2006-07-14 07:41:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by evolver 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
This is almost as bad as the bloody 'UFO'S Are Aliens!' idea. Just because something cannot be explained does not make it an eons old Dinosaur. Jesus girl, get real, where is the REAL evidence, not glorified Tabloid websites.
2006-07-14 07:41:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by thomas p 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
im sorry but there was no picture of the pterodacyl and people make up things on the internet u know. anyone can say, " i saw a pterodactyl yesterday it was 50 feet long and it was tan colored! ooo." that doesnt make it true.
2006-07-14 07:48:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by Luna Winter 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wow. The only way you could have posted a more reliable source would be if you read it in The Enquirer! I am convinced for sure!
2006-07-14 07:56:38
·
answer #6
·
answered by Nikki Tesla 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, of course. And the YETI is actually Jesus, he just hasn't shaved in 2000 years because there isn't a Walmart in the Himalayas (yet).
2006-07-14 07:41:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
You might be on to something if even one of your source links included an actual picture...
2006-07-14 07:45:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by alaskanecho 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Those are not exactly credible sources. Also, none of them have any proof.
2006-07-14 07:41:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
yeah, people have also reported seeing seamonsters, mermaids, bigfoot, and the loch ness monster, that doesn't make it true
2006-07-14 07:42:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by nunovyorebiznis 4
·
0⤊
0⤋