The two extremes are enforcement-only, or open house. Which do you think is better, and why?
2006-07-14 04:42:29 · 5 answers · asked by gokart121 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
It is the job of the government of the USA to enforce the laws! Not to hold session on whether or not they want to enforce these laws...
2006-07-14 04:48:41 · answer #1 · answered by Todd Maz 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think the Senate Bill should be burned. However, I don't think they are really waffling or they'd have voted for fences yesterday. I think they just want to put a new spin on what they are trying to do, in order to sell it.
I think we need border security now. I don't think we can get anything passed through both houses until we get rid of some of the Senators who voted for the Senate bill.
2006-07-14 13:46:41 · answer #2 · answered by DAR 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, it doesn't take a lot of common sense to know what the yahoo category wants, but in case you haven't noticed most Americans are apathetic. I agree with Dar about securing the borders and go from there. Don't expect too much to change. Elections years are exactly that, full of mindless rhetoric.
2006-07-14 15:34:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Seal the border , send illegals back and enforce the laws.
Congress is a worthless bunch of old men and older women who do nothing so will they act? I doubt it.
2006-07-14 11:52:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
ROUND THEM UP AND SEND THEM HOME!!!!!!
Jail for employers who hire without documents.
2006-07-14 11:46:07 · answer #5 · answered by LoneStar 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋